Table 2.
Agent | Tumors | Collection time | Improved clinical outcome association | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pembrolizumab | Melanoma | Pretreatment | Higher CD8+ (but not CD4+) T‐cell densities at the invasive margin and within the tumor parenchyma | 34 |
On‐treatment | Increase in CD8+ T‐cell density | 34 | ||
Melanoma | Pretreatment On‐treatment | A modest association was found between CD8+, CD3+, and CD45RO+ T‐cell densities with clinical benefit. After anti‐PD‐1 treatment, the associations were more significant | 36 | |
Nivolumab | NSCLC | Pretreatment | Higher CD8+ TIL density | 37 |
Atezolizumab | Multiple cancers | Pretreatment | Baseline TIL status was not associated with clinical activity | 16 |
Avelumab | EBV‐positive gastric cancer | Pretreatment | Higher lymphocytic infiltration | 38 |
Durvalumab | NSCLC | On‐treatment | More CD8+ TILs during therapy (6 wk after onset of durvalumab therapy) than at baseline was found. However, it was not associated with clinical activity | 39 |
Ipilimumab | Melanoma | Pretreatment | Baseline TIL status was not associated with clinical activity | 35 |
On‐treatment | Increased TIL density (after the second dose) was associated with significantly greater clinical activity | 35 |
TIL, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocyte; EBV, Epstein‐Barr virus.