Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 7;7(9):4517–4529. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1722

Table 2.

Correlation between TILs and the response to immune checkpoint therapy

Agent Tumors Collection time Improved clinical outcome association References
Pembrolizumab Melanoma Pretreatment Higher CD8+ (but not CD4+) T‐cell densities at the invasive margin and within the tumor parenchyma 34
On‐treatment Increase in CD8+ T‐cell density 34
Melanoma Pretreatment On‐treatment A modest association was found between CD8+, CD3+, and CD45RO+ T‐cell densities with clinical benefit. After anti‐PD‐1 treatment, the associations were more significant 36
Nivolumab NSCLC Pretreatment Higher CD8+ TIL density 37
Atezolizumab Multiple cancers Pretreatment Baseline TIL status was not associated with clinical activity 16
Avelumab EBV‐positive gastric cancer Pretreatment Higher lymphocytic infiltration 38
Durvalumab NSCLC On‐treatment More CD8+ TILs during therapy (6 wk after onset of durvalumab therapy) than at baseline was found. However, it was not associated with clinical activity 39
Ipilimumab Melanoma Pretreatment Baseline TIL status was not associated with clinical activity 35
On‐treatment Increased TIL density (after the second dose) was associated with significantly greater clinical activity 35

TIL, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocyte; EBV, Epstein‐Barr virus.