Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Cancer. 2017 Nov 10;69(8):1185–1195. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1367946

Associations of calcium and dairy products with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) prospective cohort studyi

Caroline Y Um 1, Suzanne E Judd 1,2, W Dana Flanders 3,4, Veronika Fedirko 1,3,4, Roberd M Bostick 1,3,4
PMCID: PMC6145131  NIHMSID: NIHMS1502676  PMID: 29125314

Abstract

Associations of calcium and dairy product intakes with cardiovascular disease risk and cancer mortality are controversial.

We investigated associations of calcium and dairy product intakes with mortality in the prospective REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study (n=30,239). Of 2,966 total deaths, 32.3% were from CVD and 28.8% from cancer.

For those in the upper relative to the lowest quintile of intakes, from Cox proportional hazards regression models, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality were 1.13 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.95–1.35; P-trend 0.004) for whole milk, and 0.75 (CI 0.61–0.93; P-trend 0.001) for non-fat milk; for CVD mortality the corresponding HRs were 0.80 (CI 0.55–1.16; P-trend 0.80) and 0.72 (CI 0.49–1.05; P-trend 0.06); and for cancer mortality they were 1.56 (CI 1.17–2.08; P-trend 0.006) and 0.89 (CI 0.62–1.28; P-trend 0.86). Calcium (total, dietary, supplemental) and total dairy products intakes were not associated with all-cause, cardiovascular, or cancer mortality.

These results suggest that whole milk consumption may be directly associated with cancer mortality; non-fat milk consumption may be inversely associated with all-cause and cardiovascular- and cancer-specific mortality; and calcium intake independent of milk products intakes may not be associated with mortality.

Keywords: Calcium, dairy, milk, mortality, prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Calcium is an essential nutrient required for many processes, including bone health, cardiac and vascular smooth muscle function, nerve transmission, and enzyme secretion. Calcium concentrations are tightly maintained in the body and sources are both dietary and supplemental. Dietary Reference Intakes in adults over age 50 is 1,000 mg/d for males and 1,200 mg/d for females until the age of 70, at which point the overall recommendation for both sexes is 1,200 mg/d [1]. Dairy products are one of the leading sources of dietary calcium in the average American diet, and the recently released 2015 Dietary Guidelines recommends consumption of 3 cup-equivalents per day of fat-free and low-fat dairy products for adults [2].

Recent reviews and meta-analyses reported inverse associations between calcium and dairy products with risk for colorectal cancer and metabolic syndrome [35], which suggests that higher intakes, within reasonable limits, may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality. Heart disease and cancer are the two leading causes of mortality in the United States and worldwide [6, 7], and calcium supplements are commonly recommended, especially among women and the elderly. However, recent reports have raised concern of a potential increase in risk for myocardial infarction and related deaths among older postmenopausal women taking calcium supplements [8, 9]. Observational studies also reported higher risk of prostate cancer associated with intakes of dietary and dairy calcium and dairy products but not with supplemental or non-dairy calcium [10], suggesting components of dairy products other than calcium, such as insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), may contribute to risk.

In general, there are no clear patterns of association from numerous clinical trials and observational studies of calcium and dairy products with cardiovascular disease mortality, and few studies reported associations with cancer mortality. Thus, the purpose of this analysis was to investigate associations of total, dietary, and supplemental calcium and milk products with risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease-specific, and cancer-specific mortality in the prospective REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Population

The REGARDS study is a national prospective cohort study designed to recruit equal numbers of black and white men and women. Details on the study population and objectives were described previously [11, 12]. Briefly, between January 2003 and October 2007, participants aged 45 years and older were recruited from the continental United States with an oversampling of blacks and persons residing in the “Stroke Belt,” a region of high stroke mortality defined at the design of this study to encompass Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee. Potential participants were first contacted via mail and then telephone by trained interviewers to determine eligibility. Exclusion criteria included race other than black or white, active treatment for cancer, medical conditions that would prevent long-term participation, cognitive impairment judged by the telephone interviewer, residence in or inclusion on a waiting list for a nursing home, or inability to communicate in English. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at all participating institutions. Verbal and written informed consent were obtained from all participants.

Computer-assisted telephone interviews, in-home visits, and self-administered questionnaires left with participants to complete after the in-home visit were used to collect data. Medical history, medication use, smoking status, alcohol use, demographics, and physical activity (times per week) were collected via telephone interview, while blood and urine samples, anthropometrics, and additional risk factor data were collected during in-home visits. Self-administered questionnaires included the Block 98 Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and a family history questionnaire.

Dietary Assessment

Dietary intake was assessed using a self-administered Block FFQ (developed by NutritionQuest, Berkeley, California), which contains over 150 multiple-choice questions based on 107 food items and was validated for most nutrients and in different populations [13, 14]. Participants were provided with pictures to assist in identifying portion sizes, and frequency choices varied from never/few times per year to every day. Relevant questions that were used to create variables of interest for this analysis included those to assess intakes of calcium supplements and multivitamins, dairy products (milk, cream, fermented dairy products, ice cream, butter, cheeses), and other non-dairy, calcium-containing foods (e.g., fortified orange juice). Available milk choices were whole, reduced fat (2%), low-fat (1%), and non-fat (skim).

Outcome Assessment

Participants and their proxies were contacted via telephone at 6-month intervals to ascertain hospitalizations and deaths, for which medical records were also obtained. For reported deaths, interviews with next of kin or proxy were conducted to collect information relevant to the death. Deaths were confirmed through death certificates and National Death Index data. Two adjudicators independently reviewed reported deaths, using baseline participant clinical characteristics, proxy interviews, death certificates, and if available, medical records for hospitalizations occurring within 30 days of the death to determine the cause of the participant’s death. The Social Security and National Death Indices were searched for participants who were reported as lost to follow-up. For our analyses, all-cause and cause-specific (cardiovascular and cancer) mortalities were the primary outcomes. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality included deaths from coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, other cardiac, and other cardiovascular causes. Deaths from specific types of cancers were not collected.

Statistical Analyses

The focus of our analyses was on calcium (from dairy and other sources), milk (as a prominent source of calcium) with and without fat, and the non-fat/non-calcium component of milk, in an attempt to clarify which components of milk, individually or combined, may or may not affect risk for dying of the two major overall causes of death in the US. Other specific dairy products were not a focus of our analyses either because they were consumed by relatively few study participants, contain no or minimal amounts of calcium (e.g., butter), or contain potentially confounding added components (e.g., ice cream, yogurt). Thus, given our hypotheses, we focused on the “cleanest” dairy exposures (types of milk), and only analyzed the other types of dairy products as part of a total dairy products variable.

Since dietary data obtained from food frequency questionnaires are semi-quantitative and primarily used to rank participants relative to one another in relation to their intakes of foods and nutrients [13], sex-specific quintiles of calcium and dairy product intakes were used in this analysis, with the lowest categories used as reference. For supplemental calcium and whole, low-fat, and non-fat milks, the reference category was no consumption and quartiles of consumption were used as the remaining 4 categories. For our analyses, low-fat (1%) and reduced fat (2%) milks were combined as low-fat milk. The characteristics of the study population at baseline were summarized according to quintiles of total calcium and total dairy intakes, and chi-square tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables were used to test differences across exposure quintiles.

Total follow-up time was calculated as the time between the first interview date and the date of death, last follow-up date, or December 31, 2012, whichever came first. Because dietary calcium intake was highly correlated with milk intake, residuals from the linear regression models of non-fat milk with dietary calcium were determined to examine the association of non-fat milk adjusted for dietary calcium. This method was patterned after the energy adjustment residual method [15] with the dependent variable being non-fat milk and the independent variable being dietary calcium; the intent was that the calcium-adjusted residuals would represent a possible indirect indicator of the non-calcium, non-fat components of milk (such as IGF-1). The same procedure was followed for whole and low-fat milk. All calcium-adjusted residuals were categorized into sex-specific quintiles for Cox proportional hazards models in which dietary calcium was included because of its expected independent associations with mortality.

Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of quintiles of calcium and dairy product intakes with all-cause and cause-specific mortalities. Age was used as the time variable in all models. Potential confounders were selected on the basis of biological plausibility, previous literature, and whether inclusion of the variable changed the adjusted HR for the primary exposure variable by ≥ 10%. Potential confounding variables considered included age (continuous), sex (male/female), race (black/white), region (Belt, Buckle, Non-belt), body mass index (BMI; kg/m2; continuous), smoking status (never, past, current), alcohol intake (none, moderate, heavy), physical activity (none, 1–3 times/week, 4+ times/week), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and aspirin use (yes/no), hormone replacement therapy use in females (yes/no), college education or higher (yes/no), annual income categories (refused, < $20,000, $20,000-$34,000, $35,000-$74,000; ≥ $75,000), total energy intake (kcal), fruit and vegetable servings/day, processed and red meat servings/day, whole grain servings/day, nut servings/day, vitamin D (IU/day), dietary fiber (g/day), and a dietary oxidative balance score (OBS). The dietary OBS was calculated using a previously described equal weight method [16] and is comprised of anti- (carotene, lutein, lycopene, vitamin C and E, omega-3 fatty acids, flavonoids) and pro-oxidant (dietary iron, omega-6 fatty acids, saturated fat) nutrients. The fully adjusted model included age, sex, race, region, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, NSAID and aspirin use, hormone replacement therapy use, education, annual income, the dietary OBS, and total energy, total fruit and vegetable, and processed and red meat intakes. Proportional hazards assumptions were tested using Log-Log survival curves, Schoenfeld residuals, and extended Cox models for each exposure and potential covariate. Trends across quintiles of calcium and dairy product intakes were assessed by including quintile- and sex-specific median values as a continuous variable in regression models.

To assess potential effect modification for all-cause and cause-specific mortalities, stratified analyses were conducted by sex, race, region, BMI (sex-specific medians: males < / ≥ 27.8 kg/m2, females < / ≥ 28.5 kg/m2), NSAID and aspirin use, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity (none, 1–3 times/week, ≥ 4 times/week), total energy intake (sex-specific medians: males < / ≥ 1,744 kcal/day, females </ ≥ 1,460 kcal/day), total fat intake (sex-specific medians: males < / ≥ 71.5 g/day, females </ ≥ 59.5 g/day), and supplemental calcium use (yes / no).

Sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Models were further adjusted for baseline comorbidities (self-reported history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or cancer). We also excluded deaths that occurred within 1 or 2 years of enrollment to assess the potential influence of pre-morbid health conditions. Additionally, we excluded participants based on age limits of 75, 80, and 90 years of age. Participants who were at the age limit or older at baseline were excluded, and for those who reached the limit during follow-up, follow-up time was calculated as the period between baseline and the point at which the age limit was reached. Finally, supplemental calcium users who reported taking supplements for less than 1 year were categorized as non-supplemental calcium users.

A two-sided P value of < 0.05 or a 95% confidence interval that did not contain 1.00 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

RESULTS

Of the original 30,239 participants enrolled in the REGARDS study, we excluded 8,812 who did not complete ≥ 15% of the FFQ questions or reported implausible energy intakes (< 800 or > 5,000 kcal/day for men and < 500 or > 4,500 kcal/day for women) leaving a final sample size of 21,427 for the analytic cohort. The overall median baseline total calcium intake was 839.8 mg/day, with intakes higher than the median more common among whites (67%) than among blacks (33%). Mean dietary and supplemental calcium, as well as total dairy product intakes were higher among whites (P < 0.0001 for all variables).

Characteristics at baseline are summarized by total calcium and by total dairy product quintiles (Table 1). Those in the highest quintiles of total calcium and dairy intake, on average, were older and had a lower BMI, and were more likely to currently smoke, have a college education or higher, participate in physical activity at least once a week, and regularly take aspirin or NSAIDs. Women in the highest quintiles were also more likely to take hormone replacement therapy. Those with the highest intakes of total calcium were less likely to have a history of diabetes and more likely have a higher annual household income. Additionally, those in the highest quintiles of total calcium and dairy intake had higher mean intakes of total energy, dietary fiber, supplemental calcium, total vitamin D, total meat, and fruits and vegetables.

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of REGARDS participants at baseline by quintiles of total calcium and total dairy product intakesa

Total Calcium Quintiles
Total Dairy Products Quintiles
1
(n = 4,284)
3
(n = 4,285)
5
(n = 4,285)
Pb 1
(n = 3,439)
3
(n = 4,256)
5
(n = 4,438)
Pb
Demographics
    Age, years 63.8 ± 9.1 64.6 ± 9.6 66.6 ± 9.2 <0.0001 64.4 ± 8.8 64.6 ± 9.2 65.4 ± 9.7 <0.0001
    Male, % 44.1 44.1 44.1 1.00 58.4 42.0 41.8 <0.0001
    White, % 49.6 66.5 81.6 <0.0001 47.5 68.5 80.8 <0.0001
    Region, Stroke Belt,c % 31.1 31.2 32.8 <0.0001 33.7 34.3 33.7 <0.0001
    Medical history,d %
        Heart disease 17.3 17.2 16.5 0.05 18.8 16.1 17.6 0.0002
        Diabetes 23.7 20.3 15.3 <0.0001 20.8 19.1 19.8 0.39
        Cancer 7.6 8.6 11.6 <0.0001 9.1 8.0 10.6 <0.0001
    College graduate or higher, % 28.5 38.5 44.9 <0.0001 32.2 38.1 40.9 <0.0001
    Annual income $35,000+, % 43.0 49.0 50.8 <0.0001 43.1 50.5 48.6 <0.0001
Lifestyle Factors
    Current smokers, % 41.7 46.1 49.2 <0.0001 39.1 44.9 48.7 <0.0001
    Moderate alcohol consumption (0–14 M, 0–7 F drinks/week), % 30.3 36.0 38.4 <0.0001 33.4 35.9 36.0 <0.0001
    Body mass index, kg/m2 30.0 ± 6.5 29.3 ± 6.4 28.1 ± 5.9 <0.0001 29.2 ± 5.9 29.3 ± 6.3 28.8 ± 6.3 <0.0001
    Physical activity, ≥ 1 times/week, % 25.8 29.1 35.8 <0.0001 27.2 29.4 33.0 <0.0001
    NSAID or aspirin use, % 47.2 51.1 57.8 <0.0001 49.1 53.8 53.9 <0.0001
    HRT, % females 49.8 57.7 67.0 <0.0001 22.7 34.8 35.7 <0.0001
Dietary Intakes
    Total energy, kcal/day 1,211 ± 401 1,853 ± 682 2,043 ± 779 <0.0001 1,440 ± 629 1,692 ± 679 2,049 ± 753 <0.0001
    Total fat, % total energy 37.4 ± 8.5 37.6 ± 7.7 36.3 ± 7.5 <0.0001 37.2 ± 8.7 38.0 ± 7.6 35.9 ± 7.6 <0.0001
    Saturated fat, g/day 14.2 ± 6.1 22.8 ± 10.7 24.2 ± 12.1 <0.0001 15.9 ± 8.5 20.6 ± 10.0 25.4 ± 12.3 <0.0001
    Dietary fiber, g/day 10.3 ± 4.7 17.0 ± 7.7 20.8 ± 0.1 <0.0001 13.4 ± 7.9 15.9 ± 8.0 19.0 ± 9.4 <0.0001
    Total calcium, mg/day 343 ± 90 887 ± 163 1,896 ± 351 <0.0001 602 ± 436 928 ± 480 1,534 ± 570 <0.0001
        Dietary calcium 316 ± 90 719 ± 210 999 ± 425 <0.0001 351 ± 174 581 ± 180 1,133 ± 333 <0.0001
        Supplemental calcium 27.4 ± 52.5 168 ± 245 897 ± 386 <0.0001 252 ± 398 347 ± 448 401 ± 472 <0.0001
    Total vitamin D, IU/day 153 ± 155 332 ± 203 495 ± 224 <0.0001 219 ± 194 297 ± 195 482 ± 245 <0.0001
    Total meat, servings/day 1.5 ± 0.8 2.1 ± 1.3 2.2 ± 1.3 <0.0001 1.8 ± 1.2 2.0 ± 1.2 2.1 ± 1.3 <0.0001
    Total fruit and vegetable, servings/day 1.9 ± 1.3 3.2 ± 2.1 3.8 ± 2.7 <0.0001 2.4± 2.1 3.0 ± 2.1 3.4 ± 2.4 <0.0001
    Total dairy, servings/d 2.3 ± 1.8 8.1 ± 4.8 13.0 ± 8.6 <0.0001 0.9 ± 0.7 5.5 ± 0.9 17.8 ± 5.9 <0.0001
    Whole milk, servings/week 0.3 ± 0.8 0.7 ± 2.4 0.9 ± 3.9 <0.0001 0.1 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 1.3 1.6 ± 4.9 <0.0001
    Reduced/low-fat milk, servings/week 1.2 ± 2.3 4.6 ± 7.5 6.0 ± 11.7 <0.0001 0.3 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 3.8 8.9 ± 13.8 <0.0001
    Skim milk, servings/week 0.1 ± 0.6 1.2 ± 3.3 3.2 ± 6.4 <0.0001 0.03 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 1.4 4.3 ± 7.2 <0.0001

Abbreviations: HRT, hormone replacement therapy; NSAID, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

a

Continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviations; categorical variables are presented as percentages.

b

P values from Chi-square test for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables.

c

Stroke Belt defined as Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee; otherwise, live in other continental US states.

d

Medical history of heart disease including self-reported myocardial infarction, coronary bypass grafting, cardiac bypass, angioplasty, stenting, or evidence of myocardial infarction via electrocardiogram; self-reported diabetes; history of any type of cancer.

Upon comparison of the highest to the lowest quintiles of intake (Table 2), in the unadjusted models total calcium was associated with a statistically significant 26% lower risk for all-cause mortality; however, in the multivariable-adjusted models, total calcium was not associated with risk for all-cause or cancer mortality, but there was an estimated non-statistically significant 9% lower risk for CVD mortality. When we built these models forward, addition of smoking status, education, and total fruit and vegetable intake tended to attenuate the estimated associations, whereas total energy intake tended to strengthen them; however, removal of no single covariate from the full models substantially affected any of the risk estimates. Dietary and supplemental calcium were not associated with all-cause, CVD, or cancer mortality.

Table 2.

Associations of calcium and total dairy intakes with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, REGARDS

Quintilesa,b,c,d
Total Calcium 1
(n = 4,284)
2
(n = 4,287)
3
(n = 4,285)
4
(n = 4,286)
5
(n = 4,285)
P-trende
All-cause
    Number of deaths 648 585 578 527 628
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.86 (0.77, 0.96) 0.79 (0.71, 0.89) 0.71 (0.63, 0.79) 0.74 (0.66, 0.82) 0.0001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.94 (0.84, 1.06) 0.96 (0.85, 1.08) 0.89 (0.79, 1.02) 1.04 (0.91, 1.18) 0.86
CVDg
    Number of deaths 224 179 193 172 189
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.76 (0.63, 0.93) 0.76 (0.63, 0.92) 0.67 (0.55, 0.81) 0.63 (0.52, 0.77) 0.002
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.85 (0.70, 1.05) 0.93 (0.76, 1.15) 0.87 (0.69, 1.08) 0.91 (0.73, 1.15) 0.41
Cancer
    Number of deaths 184 180 160 157 173
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.94 (0.76, 1.15) 0.79 (0.64, 0.98) 0.74 (0.60, 0.91) 0.74 (0.60, 0.91) 0.02
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.00 (0.81, 1.23) 0.91 (0.72, 1.14) 0.88 (0.69, 1.12) 0.97 (0.76, 1.23) 0.66
Dietary Calcium (n = 4,282) (n = 4,285) (n = 4,289) (n = 4,286) (n = 4,285)
All-causes
    Number of deaths 635 588 571 591 581
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.91 (0.81, 1.02) 0.85 (0.76, 0.95) 0.85 (0.76, 0.95) 0.80 (0.72, 0.90) 0.58
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.98 (0.88, 1.10) 0.95 (0.84, 1.07) 1.00 (0.88, 1.14) 0.98 (0.85, 1.13) 0.97
CVDg
    Number of deaths 219 192 170 187 189
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.87 (0.71, 1.05) 0.74 (0.60, 0.90) 0.78 (0.64, 0.95) 0.76 (0.62, 0.92) 0.93
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.97 (0.79, 1.18) 0.86 (0.69, 1.06) 0.97 (0.78, 1.22) 0.99 (0.77, 1.28) 0.87
Cancer
    Number of deaths 174 181 179 156 164
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.01 (0.82, 1.24) 0.97 (0.79, 1.20) 0.83 (0.67, 1.03) 0.85 (0.69, 1.05) 0.94
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.05 (0.85, 1.30) 1.03 (0.82, 1.29) 0.92 (0.72, 1.17) 0.94 (0.71, 1.23) 0.44
Supplemental Calciumh (n = 8,114) (n = 3,360) (n = 4,208) (n = 1,999) (n = 3,746)
All-causes
    Number of deaths 1,230 411 582 226 517
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.80 (0.72, 0.90) 0.82 (0.74, 0.90) 0.64 (0.56, 0.74) 0.72 (0.65, 0.80) <0.0001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.00 (0.89, 1.12) 0.94 (0.85, 1.04) 0.92 (0.79, 1.07) 1.05 (0.94, 1.17) 0.96
CVDg
    Number of deaths 399 134 195 76 153
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.81 (0.66, 0.98) 0.85 (0.72, 1.01) 0.67 (0.52, 0.85) 0.65 (0.54, 0.79) 0.001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.05 (0.86, 1.29) 0.95 (0.80, 1.14) 0.97 (0.75, 1.26) 0.95 (0.78, 1.16) 0.32
Cancer
    Number of deaths 371 114 163 62 144
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.74 (0.60, 0.91) 0.76 (0.63, 0.91) 0.59 (0.45, 0.77) 0.67 (0.55, 0.81) 0.002
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.91 (0.73, 1.13) 0.85 (0.70, 1.03) 0.84 (0.63, 1.10) 0.95 (0.78, 1.17) 0.48
Total Dairy Products (n = 3,715) (n = 4,592) (n = 4,256) (n = 4,219) (n = 4,645)
All-causes
    Number of deaths 512 648 572 563 671
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.95 (0.85, 1.07) 0.91 (0.81, 1.02) 0.81 (0.72, 0.92) 0.87 (0.77, 0.97) 0.09
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)i 1.00 0.97 (0.86, 1.09) 1.01 (0.90, 1.15) 0.93 (0.82, 1.06) 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) 0.39
CVDg
    Number of deaths 171 201 200 181 204
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.88 (0.72, 1.08) 0.95 (0.77, 1.17) 0.78 (0.63, 0.96) 0.78 (0.64, 0.96) 0.92
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)i 1.00 0.90 (0.73, 1.11) 1.11 (0.90, 1.37) 0.93 (0.74, 1.16) 1.03 (0.82, 1.29) 0.75
Cancer
    Number of deaths 145 193 171 155 190
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.00 (0.80, 1.24) 0.96 (0.77, 1.20) 0.81 (0.64, 1.01) 0.89 (0.72, 1.11) 0.64
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)i 1.00 1.01 (0.81, 1.25) 1.03 (0.82, 1.30) 0.90 (0.71, 1.14) 1.02 (0.80, 1.29) 0.85

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a

The median (range) intakes (mg/d) of total calcium in the quintiles for men were 371 (77.9 – 475), 567 (475 - <658), 757 (658 - <879), 1,044 (879 - <1,313), 1,677 (1,313 – 3,800), and for women they were 345 (85.8 – 477), 607 (477 - <758), 975 (758 - <1,259), 1,471 (1,259 – 1,661), 1,917 (1,661 – 3,823), respectively.

b

The median (range) intakes (mg/d) of dietary calcium in the quintiles for men were 316 (77.9 – 402), 476 (402 - <552), 627 (552 - <711), 815 (711 - <945), 1,160 (945 – 2,884), and for women they were 255 (76.9 – 337), 411 (337 - <483), 559 (483 - <644), 745 (644 - <882), 1,100 (882 – 2,693), respectively.

c

The median (range) intakes (mg/d) of supplemental calcium in the categories for men were 0 (0), 37.2 (>0 - <93.0), 130 (93.0 - <286), 323 (286 - <752), 1,130 (752 – 1,130), and for women they were 0 (0), 130 (>0 - <286), 379 (286 - <845), 1,000 (845 - <1,093), 1,130 (1,093 – 1,130), respectively.

d

The median (range) intakes (g/d) of total dairy products in the quintiles for men were 22.2 (0 - <46.8), 79.8 (46.8 - <116), 154 (116 - <206), 268 (206 - <350), 511 (350 – 1,468), and for women they were 17.0 (0 - <37.1), 31.4 (37.1 - <93.8), 133 (93.8 - <177), 242 (177 - <319), 484 (319 – 1,368), respectively.

e

P-trend calculated using sex-specific medians of each quantile.

f

Adjusted for age, sex, race, region, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin use, hormone replacement therapy use (females), education, annual income, total energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, processed and red meat intake, dietary oxidative balance score.

g

Cardiovascular disease mortality includes deaths due to myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, sudden death, other cardiac causes, and other cardiovascular non-cardiac causes.

h

Supplemental calcium analyzed as 5 categories of intake with no intake as the reference category.

i

Adjusted for age, sex, race, region, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin use, hormone replacement therapy use (females), education, annual income, supplemental calcium, total energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, processed and red meat intake, dietary oxidative balance score.

Total dairy products were not associated with all-cause or cause-specific mortality (Table 2). However, as noted in Table 3, for those in the upper relative to the lowest categories of intakes, whole milk was associated with an estimated 13% higher risk of all-cause mortality (point estimate not statistically significant, but P-trend = 0.004), 20% lower risk for CVD mortality (not statistically significant), and statistically significant 56% higher risk for all cancer mortality. Low-fat milk was associated with an estimated 8% higher risk for all-cause mortality and 20% higher risk for CVD mortality, but was associated with 11% lower risk for cancer mortality (all associations not statistically significant). On the other hand, non-fat milk was statistically significantly associated with an estimated 25% lower risk for all-cause mortality, non-statistically significant 28% lower risk for CVD mortality, and non-statistically significant 11% lower risk for cancer mortality.

Table 3.

Associations of milk intakes with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, REGARDS

Categoriesa,b,c,d
1
(n = 18,429)
2
(n = 738)
3
(n = 760)
4
(n = 748)
5
(n = 752)
Ptrende
Whole Milk
All-causes
    No. of deaths 2,429 136 125 136 140
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.78 (1.50, 2.12) 1.44 (1.21, 1.73) 1.48 (1.25, 1.76) 1.40 (1.18, 1.66) <0.001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.25 (1.05, 1.50) 1.05 (0.87, 1.26) 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) 1.13 (0.95, 1.35) 0.004
CVDg
    No. of deaths 806 40 34 45 32
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.56 (1.15, 2.17) 1.19 (0.85, 1.68) 1.48 (1.10, 2.00) 0.95 (0.67, 1.36) 0.38
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.09 (0.78, 1.52) 0.84 (0.59, 1.20) 1.09 (0.80, 1.48) 0.80 (0.55, 1.16) 0.80
Cancer
    No. of deaths 689 35 41 34 55
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.61 (1.14, 2.26) 1.62 (1.18, 2.23) 1.29 (0.91, 1.82) 2.00 (1.52, 2.63) <0.001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.14 (0.81, 1.62) 1.20 (0.87, 1.65) 0.87 (0.62, 1.24) 1.56 (1.17, 2.08) 0.006
Low-Fat Milk (n = 9,114) (n = 3,074) (n = 3,087) (n = 3,074) (n = 3,078)
All-causes
    No. of deaths 1,236 387 414 434 495
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.10 (0.98, 1.23) 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) 0.98 (0.88, 1.09) 1.01 (0.91, 1.12) 0.002
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.02 (0.91, 1.14) 0.95 (0.85, 1.06) 1.00 (0.90, 1.12) 1.08 (0.97, 1.12) 0.65
CVDg
    No. of deaths 369 140 139 147 162
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.35 (1.12, 1.65) 1.04 (0.86, 1.27) 1.11 (0.91, 1.34) 1.09 (0.91, 1.31) 0.004
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.24 (1.02, 1.51) 1.04 (0.85, 1.26) 1.14 (0.94, 1.38) 1.20 (0.99, 1.45) 0.12
Cancer
    No. of deaths 372 108 123 135 116
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.98 (0.79, 1.22) 0.95 (0.77, 1.16) 1.02 (0.84, 1.25) 0.82 (0.66, 1.01) 0.93
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.95 (0.76, 1.18) 0.99 (0.81, 1.22) 1.07 (0.88, 1.31) 0.89 (0.72, 1.10) 0.33
Non-Fat Milk (n = 17,749) (n = 917) (n = 920) (n = 906) (n = 935)
All-causes
    No. of deaths 2,575 98 92 110 91
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.78 (0.64, 0.96) 0.60 (0.49, 0.74) 0.74 (0.61, 0.90) 0.56 (0.46, 0.69) <0.001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.93 (0.76, 1.14) 0.76 (0.61, 0.94) 1.01 (0.83, 1.22) 0.75 (0.61, 0.93) 0.001
CVDg
    No. of deaths 829 36 26 38 28
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.91 (0.65, 1.27) 0.53 (0.36, 0.78) 0.80 (0.58, 1.10) 0.53 (0.37, 0.78) 0.01
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 1.02 (0.73, 1.43) 0.65 (0.44, 0.97) 1.05 (0.75, 1.46) 0.72 (0.49, 1.05) 0.06
Cancer
    No. of deaths 735 22 26 40 31
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.60 (0.39, 0.91) 0.60 (0.41, 0.89) 0.93 (0.68, 1.28) 0.68 (0.47, 0.97) 0.22
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)f 1.00 0.73 (0.47, 1.11) 0.75 (0.50, 1.12) 1.25 (0.90, 1.73) 0.89 (0.62, 1.28) 0.86

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a

Five categories of milk intake with no intake as reference category.

b

The median (range) intakes (g/d) of whole milk in the categories for men were 0 (0), 10.9 (>0 - <34.8), 74.2 (34.8 - <112), 171 (112 - <246), 382 (246 – 1,216), and for women they were 0 (0), 10.4 (>0 - <20.9), 41.9 (20.9 - < 78.0), 119 (78.0 - <186), 325 (186 – 1,288), respectively.

c

The median (range) intakes (g/d) of low-fat milk in the categories for men were 0 (0), 11.9 (>0 - <39.4), 78.5 (39.4 - <121), 177 (121 - <249), 382 (249 – 1,310), and for women they were 0 (0), 8.1 (>0 - <23.7), 56.9 (23.7 - < 97.3), 144 (97.3 - <230), 348 (230 – 1,351), respectively.

d

The median (range) intakes (g/d) of non-fat milk in the categories for men were 0 (0), 56.6 (>0 - <109), 162 (109 - <239), 291 (239 - <383), 552 (383 – 1,220), and for women they were 0 (0), 38.9 (>0 - <105), 146 (105 - < 208), 271 (208 - <382), 534 (382 – 1,175), respectively.

e

P-trend calculated using sex-specific medians of each quantile.

f

Adjusted for age, sex, race, region, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin use, hormone replacement therapy use (females), education, annual income, supplemental calcium, total energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, processed and red meat intake, dietary oxidative balance score.

g

Cardiovascular disease mortality includes deaths due to myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, sudden death, other cardiac causes, and other cardiovascular non-cardiac causes.

As shown in Table 4, for those in the upper relative to the lowest quintiles, residuals of total whole and low-fat milks were associated with an estimated borderline statistically significant 11% higher risk of all-cause mortality, 17% higher risk of CVD mortality (not statistically significant), and 16% higher risk of cancer mortality (not statistically significant). However, non-fat milk residuals were associated with borderline statistically significant 19% lower risk for all-cause mortality, non-statistically significant 29% lower risk for CVD mortality, and non-statistically significant 11% higher risk of cancer mortality.

Table 4.

Associations of whole/low-fat and non-fat milk residuals with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, REGARDS

Quintiles
1 2 3 4 5 P-trenda
Whole/Low-Fat Milk Residuals (n = 6,116) (n = 3,827) (n = 3,828) (n = 3,828) (n = 3,828)
All-causes
    Number of deaths 699 523 508 580 656
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.38 (1.23, 1.55) 1.25 (1.12, 1.41) 1.33 (1.19, 1.49) 1.32 (1.18, 1.46) <0.0001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)b 1.00 1.16 (1.02, 1.31) 1.03 (0.92, 1.16) 1.11 (0.99, 1.24) 1.11 (0.99, 1.25) 0.03
CVDc
    Number of deaths 218 179 147 204 209
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.53 (1.25, 1.86) 1.17 (0.95, 1.44) 1.49 (1.23, 1.80) 1.33 (1.10, 1.61) <0.0001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)b 1.00 1.34 (1.08, 1.65) 0.98 (0.79, 1.21) 1.23 (1.01, 1.50) 1.17 (0.95, 1.43) 0.10
Cancer
    Number of deaths 207 152 149 160 186
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 1.34 (1.09, 1.66) 1.24 (1.00, 1.53) 1.26 (1.03, 1.55) 1.32 (1.09, 1.61) 0.0004
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)b 1.00 1.13 (0.90, 1.42) 1.03 (0.83, 1.27) 1.09 (0.88, 1.34) 1.16 (0.94, 1.44) 0.33
Non-fat Milk Residuals (n = 17,749) (n = 918) (n = 920) (n = 920) (n = 920)
All-causes
    Number of deaths 2,575 93 88 103 107
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.68 (0.55, 0.83) 0.66 (0.53, 0.81) 0.67 (0.55, 0.82) 0.65 (0.54, 0.79) <0.0001
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)b 1.00 0.86 (0.70, 1.07) 0.83 (0.67, 1.04) 0.86 (0.70, 1.05) 0.81 (0.66, 1.00) 0.0001
CVDc
    Number of deaths 829 27 27 43 31
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.61 (0.42, 0.89) 0.63 (0.43, 0.93) 0.88 (0.64, 1.19) 0.58 (0.41, 0.84) 0.02
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)b 1.00 0.75 (0.50, 1.11) 0.79 (0.54, 1.17) 1.07 (0.78, 1.46) 0.71 (0.49, 1.03) 0.09
Cancer
    Number of deaths 735 23 24 32 40
    Unadjusted HR (95% CI) 1.00 0.58 (0.39, 0.88) 0.61 (0.40, 0.91) 0.74 (0.52, 1.05) 0.86 (0.63, 1.18) 0.19
    Fully adjusted HR (95% CI)b 1.00 0.74 (0.48, 1.13) 0.74 (0.49, 1.13) 0.96 (0.67, 1.38) 1.11 (0.79, 1.55) 0.99

Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a

P-trend calculated using sex-specific medians of each quintile.

b

Adjusted for age, sex, race, region, body mass index, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and aspirin use, hormone replacement therapy use (females), education, annual income, dietary calcium, total energy intake, fruit and vegetable intake, processed and red meat intake, dietary oxidative balance score.

c

Cardiovascular disease mortality includes deaths due to myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, sudden death, other cardiac causes, and other cardiovascular non-cardiac causes.

Because previous evidence suggested that supplemental calcium use, especially without concomitant supplemental vitamin D, in postmenopausal women may increase risk for myocardial infarction and related deaths [8, 9], we conducted an additional analysis of calcium supplement use among pre- and postmenopausal females. However, we found no evidence of higher risk for all-cause or cause-specific mortality among postmenopausal women who took calcium supplements, with or without vitamin D (data not shown).

Analyses stratified by race and other participant characteristics were repeated for all exposures, but there were no strong or consistent patterns to suggest effect modification (Supplemental Tables 1 – 11). In sensitivity analyses, further adjustment for comorbidities at baseline, exclusion of deaths that occurred within 1 or 2 years after enrollment, re-classification of supplemental calcium use for less than 1 year as no supplemental calcium use, and exclusions and follow-up time adjustments based on age limits of 75, 80, and 90 years of age did not materially change any of the associations (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The results from this study suggest that whole milk may be associated with higher risk of cancer mortality, while non-fat milk may be associated with lower risk for all-cause and cardiovascular- and cancer-specific mortality. We found no evidence that total, dietary, or supplemental calcium were associated with all-cause or cardiovascular- or cancer-specific mortality, thus suggesting that calcium intake independent of milk product intake may not be associated with mortality. Our results also raise the possibility that the non-fat/non-calcium components of milk (which include IGF-1) may be associated with modestly higher risk for cancer mortality.

Calcium and dairy products may plausibly affect risk for CVD and cancer by various mechanisms. Calcium binds bile acids and free fatty acids in the gut, decreasing fat absorption, potentially lowering cholesterol, and reducing damage to gut epithelial cells, which decreases the risk for colorectal cancer [17, 18]. Calcium is also essential for normal cardiac and vascular smooth muscle function and is needed for platelet activation and coagulation [19, 20], but high levels may also increase coronary artery calcification, especially among those with reduced renal function [21]. The mechanisms of action of milk products are expected to be similar, although other nutrients with different potential mechanisms are present. Clinical trials of calcium supplementation, with or without vitamin D, reported favorable changes in blood lipids but no appreciable effects on blood pressure [22, 23], while trials of dairy products reported no changes in blood lipid profiles or blood pressure with non-fat milk consumption [24, 25].

The most recent meta-analysis of a nested case-control study and prospective cohort studies reported inconsistent associations of calcium with mortality. Total calcium was associated with higher risk of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality, while dietary calcium was associated with lower risks [26]. Supplemental calcium was associated with higher risk of cancer mortality but lower risk of CVD and all-cause mortality (statistically significant). An additional meta-analysis of 8 prospective cohort studies with a weighted mean follow-up time of 13.4 years reported 13% higher risk of CVD mortality associated with higher baseline levels of serum calcium [27].

Associations of dairy products with cardiovascular disease and mortality are also inconsistent. In the most recent meta-analysis, there was no association of milk intake with risk of all-cause mortality per 200 mL daily increase [28], though significant heterogeneity was noted (P = 0.001). Milk intake was only statistically significantly associated with lower risk of CVD. Since the publication of this meta-analysis, 2 additional studies were published, including a cross-sectional analysis of overweight or obese adults finding that total dairy products, reduced fat milk, and dairy calcium were inversely associated with BMI, percent body fat, and waist circumference, while whole milk and dairy fat were positively associated [29]. A population-based cohort study of total dairy product intake found no associations with risk of coronary heart disease or stroke [30].The fat content of dairy products was hypothesized to increase CVD risk, but the most recent review of high-fat dairy product consumption and cardiovascular outcomes reported inconsistent associations with total high-fat dairy products and whole milk [31]. In our study, low-fat milk was associated with higher risk, while whole and non-fat milks were associated with lower risk (all associations non-statistically significant). Whole and low-fat milk residuals, adjusted for dietary calcium were associated with higher risk, suggesting that milk fat intake may be directly associated with CVD mortality. However, chance or uncontrolled confounding as explanations for our findings cannot be ruled out.

In our analyses, whole milk was statistically significantly associated with higher risk of cancer mortality, but low- and non-fat milk intakes were inversely associated with cancer mortality. However, the pattern of modest positive associations of whole/low-fat and non-fat milk residuals we observed suggest the possibility that non-calcium components of milk may be associated with modestly higher risk of cancer mortality. Our findings for these residuals, which may be an indirect measure of other milk components, such as IGF-1, are consistent with previous studies that reported positive associations of IGF-1 levels with risk for breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. In the most recent meta-analysis, IGF-1 was associated with 93% higher risk of pre-menopausal breast cancer, 83% higher risk of prostate cancer, and 58% higher risk of colorectal cancer, all statistically significant [32]. The most recent meta-analysis of calcium, milk products, and risk for prostate cancer reported positive associations of dietary and dairy calcium, total milk products, and total milk with risk for prostate cancer [10]. Supplemental and non-dairy calcium were not associated with prostate cancer risk, supporting the hypothesis that the positive association with prostate cancer risk may be due to a non-calcium component of milk products. IGF-1 may plausibly increase risk for cancers since many tumor cells both produce IGF-1 and overexpress the IGF-1 receptor, potentially leading to increased cell survival and tumor growth [33]. However, it will be important to further investigate specific cancer mortalities because although IGF-1 was previously associated with higher risk of cancers and dietary calcium was associated with higher risk of prostate cancer, total calcium was previously associated with lower risk of all-cause and colorectal cancer-specific mortality [34]. Therefore, the association of calcium, dairy products, and the IGF-1 component of milk with cancer mortality may vary by cancer type.

Our results do not suggest an association of supplemental calcium intake among postmenopausal women with CVD mortality. Previous studies reported that supplemental calcium was inversely associated with CVD mortality in postmenopausal women [35, 36], but recent trials and observational studies suggested conflicting associations [8, 9]. The most recent meta-analysis of postmenopausal women from 18 randomized controlled trials reported no effect of calcium supplementation, with or without vitamin D, on risk for coronary heart disease, all-cause mortality, or other cardiovascular disease outcomes [37].

Our study had several limitations. Data on specific cancers were unavailable. Self-reported FFQs also may not accurately capture all sources of each nutrient; however, the Block 98 is a standardized and validated FFQ, and categories of calcium and dairy product intakes were used in this analysis, rather than absolute values. No data were collected to distinguish between conventionally- and organically-produced milk, which may be important to collect in future studies since higher IGF-1 concentrations were reported in conventionally-produced than in organic milk due to the use of bovine somatotropin hormone [38]. Although our estimated milk residuals were fully adjusted for dietary calcium, further research is needed on the use of residuals to estimate the non-calcium component of milk, in general, and IGF-1 exposure from milk, in particular. Finally, covariate information and dietary data were available only at baseline. However, although dietary patterns may change, many other covariates, such as race, sex, and region, are unlikely to change over time.

Strengths of our study include the use of a novel approach in estimating fat-containing and non-fat milk residuals to investigate the non-calcium and non-fat components of milk products, the prospective design, and a study population that included sufficient numbers of black and white men and women to allow analyses stratified by race and sex. Finally, all causes of death were adjudicated by clinicians using death certificates, medical records, and interviews with proxies and family members.

In summary, taken together with previous literature, our results suggest that whole milk may be associated with higher risk of cancer mortality, while non-fat milk may be associated with lower risk for all-cause and cardiovascular- and cancer-specific mortality. We found no evidence that total, dietary, or supplemental calcium were associated with all-cause or cardiovascular- or cancer-specific mortality, thus suggesting that calcium intake independent of milk product intake may not be associated with mortality. Our results also raise the possibility that the non-fat/non-calcium components of milk (which include IGF-1), may be associated with modestly higher risk for cancer mortality. Further study of the fat and non-calcium/non-fat components of milk and dairy products are needed to clarify our findings. Finally, our results, taken together with previous literature, suggest that current dietary recommendations for the consumption dairy products as part of a balanced diet that may reduce the risk of chronic diseases [39] may be dependent on the fat and IGF-1 composition of these products.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial Support: The REGARDS research project is supported by a cooperative agreement U01 NS041588 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Service. Additional support provided by the Franklin Foundation.

Abbreviations:

BMI

body mass index

CVD

cardiovascular disease

FFQ

food frequency questionnaire

HR

hazard ratio

IGF-1

insulin-like growth factor 1

KCAL

kilocalorie

NSAID

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug

REGARDS

REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke

95% CI

95% confidence interval

Footnotes

Conflict of interests: None

REFERENCES

  • 1.Institute of Medicine (US) Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US), 2011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2015 – 2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th Edition.
  • 3.Keum N, Aune D, Greenwood DC, Ju W, Giovannucci EL: Calcium intake and colorectal cancer risk: Dose-response meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int J Cancer, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ralston RA, Truby H, Palermo CE, Walker KZ: Colorectal cancer and nonfermented milk, solid cheese, and fermented milk consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54:1167–79, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Calton EK, James AP, Pannu PK, Soares MJ: Certain dietary patterns are beneficial for the metabolic syndrome: reviewing the evidence. Nutr Res 34:559–68, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu JQ, Murphy SL, Kochanek KD, Bastian BA: Deaths: Final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep 63:1–117, 2016. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bolland MJ, Barber PA, Doughty RN, Mason B, Horne A, Ames R, Gamble GD, Grey A, Reid IR: Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 336:262–6, 2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A, Gamble GD, Reid IR: Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis. BMJ 342:d2040, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aune D, Navarro Rosenblatt DA, Chan DS, Vieira AR, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Vatten LJ, Norat T: Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 101:87–117, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Howard VJ, Cushman M, Pulley L, Gomez CR, Go RC, Prineas RJ, Graham A, Moy CS, Howard G: The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study: objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology 25:135–43, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Judd SE, Gutierrez OM, Newby PK, Howard G, Howard VJ, Locher JL, Kissela BM, Shikany JM: Dietary patterns are associated with incident stroke and contribute to excess risk of stroke in black Americans. Stroke 44:3305–11, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Block G, Woods M, Potosky A, Clifford C: Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1327–35, 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Patterson RE, Kristal AR, Tinker LF, Carter RA, Bolton MP, Agurs-Collins T: Measurement characteristics of the Women’s Health Initiative food frequency questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 9:178–87, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Willett WC, Howe GR, Kushi LH: Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am J Clin Nutr 65:1220S–1228S; discussion 1229S-1231S, 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dash C, Goodman M, Flanders WD, Mink PJ, McCullough ML, Bostick RM: Using pathway-specific comprehensive exposure scores in epidemiology: application to oxidative balance in a pooled case-control study of incident, sporadic colorectal adenomas. Am J Epidemiol 178:610–24, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Govers MJ, Termont DS, Lapre JA, Kleibeuker JH, Vonk RJ, Van der Meer R: Calcium in milk products precipitates intestinal fatty acids and secondary bile acids and thus inhibits colonic cytotoxicity in humans. Cancer Res 56:3270–5, 1996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wargovich MJ, Eng VW, Newmark HL, Bruce WR: Calcium ameliorates the toxic effect of deoxycholic acid on colonic epithelium. Carcinogenesis 4:1205–7, 1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morgan JP, Morgan KG: Calcium and cardiovascular function. Intracellular calcium levels during contraction and relaxation of mammalian cardiac and vascular smooth muscle as detected with aequorin. Am J Med 77:33–46, 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Varga-Szabo D, Braun A, Nieswandt B: Calcium signaling in platelets. J Thromb Haemost 7:1057–66, 2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reid IR, Bristow SM, Bolland MJ: Cardiovascular complications of calcium supplements. J Cell Biochem 116:494–501, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chai W, Cooney RV, Franke AA, Bostick RM: Effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure and serum lipids and carotenoids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Ann Epidemiol 23:564–70, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schnatz PF, Jiang X, Vila-Wright S, Aragaki AK, Nudy M, O’Sullivan DM, Jackson R, LeBlanc E, Robinson JG, Shikany JM, Womack CR, Martin LW, Neuhouser ML, Vitolins MZ, Song Y, Kritchevsky S, Manson JE: Calcium/vitamin D supplementation, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and cholesterol profiles in the Women’s Health Initiative calcium/vitamin D randomized trial. Menopause 21:823–33, 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Steinmetz KA, Childs MT, Stimson C, Kushi LH, McGovern PG, Potter JD, Yamanaka WK: Effect of consumption of whole milk and skim milk on blood lipid profiles in healthy men. Am J Clin Nutr 59:612–8, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Barr SI, McCarron DA, Heaney RP, Dawson-Hughes B, Berga SL, Stern JS, Oparil S: Effects of increased consumption of fluid milk on energy and nutrient intake, body weight, and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy older adults. J Am Diet Assoc 100:810–7, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Asemi Z, Saneei P, Sabihi SS, Feizi A, Esmaillzadeh A: Total, dietary, and supplemental calcium intake and mortality from all-causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Reid IR, Gamble GD, Bolland MJ: Circulating calcium concentrations, vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review. J Intern Med, 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Soedamah-Muthu SS, Ding EL, Al-Delaimy WK, Hu FB, Engberink MF, Willett WC, Geleijnse JM: Milk and dairy consumption and incidence of cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 93:158–71, 2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Murphy KJ, Crichton GE, Dyer KA, Coates AM, Pettman TL, Milte C, Thorp AA, Berry NM, Buckley JD, Noakes M, Howe PR: Dairy foods and dairy protein consumption is inversely related to markers of adiposity in obese men and women. Nutrients 5:4665–84, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dalmeijer GW, Struijk EA, van der Schouw YT, Soedamah-Muthu SS, Verschuren WM, Boer JM, Geleijnse JM, Beulens JW: Dairy intake and coronary heart disease or stroke--a population-based cohort study. Int J Cardiol 167:925–9, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kratz M, Baars T, Guyenet S: The relationship between high-fat dairy consumption and obesity, cardiovascular, and metabolic disease. Eur J Nutr 52:1–24, 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, Minder C, O’Dwyer ST, Shalet SM, Egger M: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, and cancer risk: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Lancet 363:1346–53, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yu H, Rohan T: Role of the insulin-like growth factor family in cancer development and progression. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1472–89, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yang B, McCullough ML, Gapstur SM, Jacobs EJ, Bostick RM, Fedirko V, Flanders WD, Campbell PT: Calcium, vitamin D, dairy products, and mortality among colorectal cancer survivors: the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort. J Clin Oncol 32:2335–43, 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bostick RM, Kushi LH, Wu Y, Meyer KA, Sellers TA, Folsom AR: Relation of calcium, vitamin D, and dairy food intake to ischemic heart disease mortality among postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 149:151–61, 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.LaCroix AZ, Kotchen J, Anderson G, Brzyski R, Cauley JA, Cummings SR, Gass M, Johnson KC, Ko M, Larson J, Manson JE, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-Wende J: Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and mortality in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative calcium-vitamin D randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64:559–67, 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lewis JR, Radavelli-Bagatini S, Rejnmark L, Chen JS, Simpson JM, Lappe JM, Mosekilde L, Prentice RL, Prince RL: The effects of calcium supplementation on verified coronary heart disease hospitalization and death in postmenopausal women: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Bone Miner Res 30:165–75, 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vicini J, Etherton T, Kris-Etherton P, Ballam J, Denham S, Staub R, Goldstein D, Cady R, McGrath M, Lucy M: Survey of retail milk composition as affected by label claims regarding farm-management practices. J Am Diet Assoc 108:1198–203, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.McGuire S: Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Washington, DC: US Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services, 2015. Adv Nutr 7:202–4, 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

RESOURCES