Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 13;6(1):97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.03.002

Table 7.

Percentage of hematocrit in different equine groups evaluated during 1 and 5 h of holding in a livestock market.

Equids groups Reference value (RV)
Mean ± SE
Time of remaining
1 h
Mean ± SE
Time of remaining
5 h
Mean ± SE
P-value
Mules (n = 176) 32.30 ± 0.0008b,3 45.54 ± 1.12a,1 46.20 ± 1.11a,1 <0.0001
Donkeys (n = 244) 29.50 ± 0.000a,4 34.0 ± 0.87a,3 32.23 ± 0.45a,3 <0.0001
Cull horses (n = 466) 38.17 ± 0.0003a,1 33.67 ± 0.081b,3 39.05 ± 0.07a,2 <0.0001
Charreria horses (n = 246) 36.41 ± 0.77b,2 44.83 ± 0.84a,1 44.95 ± 0.91a,1 <0.0001
Foals (n = 158) 34.70 ± 0.69b,3 34.28 ± 0.49b,3 38.15 ± 0.69a,2 <0.0001
Ponies (n = 148) 36.33 ± 1.34a,2 38.30 ± 1.02a,2 37.92 ± 1.33a,2 0.4950

a,b,cLetters in the same row indicate differences among treatments in the same species.

1,2,3,4Numbers in the same column indicate differences among species in the same treatment. Tukey test (P < 0.05); n, number of animals; SE, standard error.