Table 1.

Essential photophysical and relevant data of Ir(III) complexes Cz‐1–Cz‐3

	Abs. λmax [nm] (ε × 103)a)	Em λmax [nm]a)	Φ [%]a), b)	Φ [%]c)	τobs [µs]a)	τr [µs]a)	FWHMd)	E ox ½ (ΔE p) [V]e)	E re pc [V]e)	T d [°C]f)
Cz‐1	289(33), 324.5(24), 358(15)	486	100	80.3	2.77	2.77	3420	0.55 (0.09)	−2.98	423
Cz‐2	287(31), 361(15)	473	83.5	86.9	3.20	3.83	3440	0.69 (0.08)	−2.81	448
Cz‐3	287(31), 322(19), 363.5(15)	476	82.7	95.6	2.7	3.26	3400	0.68 (0.09)	−2.79	386

^a)All photophysical data were recorded in CH₂Cl₂ with a conc. of 10⁻⁵ _M at RT, ε is in _M ⁻¹ cm⁻¹

^b)Emission was measured with excitation at 375 nm and in reference to Coumarin 102 in MeOH (Φ = 80%)

^c)Measured in doped film (10 wt% in DPEPO matrix)

^d)Full width at half‐maxima of PL in cm⁻¹

^e) E _½ = [(E _pa + E _pc)/2] and ΔE _p = |E _pa − E _pc| in V, while E _pa and E _pc are defined as the anodic and cathodic peak potentials referenced to Fc⁺/Fc

^f) T _d is the temperature with 5% of weight loss in thermogravimetric analysis.