TABLE 2.
Graft Preference for Various Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniquesa
| Graft Type | Male Patients | Female Patients |
|---|---|---|
| All-epiphyseal | ||
| Allograft | 4 (2) | 4 (2) |
| Autograft | 94 (47) | 96 (47) |
| Bone–patellar tendon–bone | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Hamstrings | 85 (40) | 79 (37) |
| Quadriceps | 15 (7) | 17 (8) |
| Hybrid | ||
| Allograft | 2 (1) | 2 (1) |
| Autograft | 98 (43) | 98 (43) |
| Bone–patellar tendon–bone | 2 (1) | 0 (0) |
| Hamstrings | 74 (32) | 79 (34) |
| Quadriceps | 21 (9) | 21 (9) |
| Transphyseal | ||
| Allograft | 1 (1) | 1 (1) |
| Autograft | 99 (74) | 99 (82) |
| Bone–patellar tendon–bone | 11 (8) | 10 (8) |
| Hamstrings | 72 (53) | 73 (60) |
| Quadriceps | 16 (12) | 17 (14) |
aData are reported as % (n) of respondents. Any discrepancies in percentages totaling to 100% due to rounding.