Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Feb 5;53(11):1771–1781. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1432651

Table 5.

Logistic regression models for participant 30-day alcohol use (never versus ever) and 30-day binge drinking (ever versus never) at T2, adjusting for T1 use, using alternate configurations of peer variables.

30-day Participant Alcohol Use
W4 Perceived Norms - Peer Drinking Pseudo R2 OR 95% CI
Closest 5 friends Never 0.29 Ref
Somea 2.50 1.4 4.6
Closest male friend Never 0.30 Ref
Somea 2.65 1.5 4.8
Closest female friend Never 0.29 Ref
Somea 2.72 1.4 5.2
Actual Peer Drinking OR 95% CI
Peer drinking - low cut-off None 0.33 Ref
At least one peer reports drinking 3 or more times 3.44 1.9 6.1
Peer drinking – high cut-off None 0.29 Ref
At least one peer reports drinking 6 or more times 2.42 1.3 4.4
30-day Participant Binge Drinking
W4 Perceived Norms - Peer Drunk Pseudo R2 OR 95% CI
Closest 5 friends Never 0.44 Ref
Somea 5.38 2.7 10.9
Closest male friend Never 0.42 Ref
Somea 4.50 2.3 8.9
Closest female friend Never 0.40 Ref
Somea 3.30 1.6 6.7
W4 Actual Peer Binge OR 95% CI
Peer binge- low cut-off None 0.38 2.38 1.2 4.8
At least one peer reports binging 2 or more times
Peer binge – high cut-off None 0.36 1.72 0.9 3.3
At least two peers report binging 2 or more times
a

Some includes almost never/sometimes/often/always.