Table 5.
Logistic regression models for participant 30-day alcohol use (never versus ever) and 30-day binge drinking (ever versus never) at T2, adjusting for T1 use, using alternate configurations of peer variables.
| 30-day Participant Alcohol Use | |||||
| W4 Perceived Norms - Peer Drinking | Pseudo R2 | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Closest 5 friends | Never | 0.29 | Ref | ||
| Somea | 2.50 | 1.4 | 4.6 | ||
| Closest male friend | Never | 0.30 | Ref | ||
| Somea | 2.65 | 1.5 | 4.8 | ||
| Closest female friend | Never | 0.29 | Ref | ||
| Somea | 2.72 | 1.4 | 5.2 | ||
| Actual Peer Drinking | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Peer drinking - low cut-off | None | 0.33 | Ref | ||
| At least one peer reports drinking 3 or more times | 3.44 | 1.9 | 6.1 | ||
| Peer drinking – high cut-off | None | 0.29 | Ref | ||
| At least one peer reports drinking 6 or more times | 2.42 | 1.3 | 4.4 | ||
| 30-day Participant Binge Drinking | |||||
| W4 Perceived Norms - Peer Drunk | Pseudo R2 | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Closest 5 friends | Never | 0.44 | Ref | ||
| Somea | 5.38 | 2.7 | 10.9 | ||
| Closest male friend | Never | 0.42 | Ref | ||
| Somea | 4.50 | 2.3 | 8.9 | ||
| Closest female friend | Never | 0.40 | Ref | ||
| Somea | 3.30 | 1.6 | 6.7 | ||
| W4 Actual Peer Binge | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Peer binge- low cut-off | None | 0.38 | 2.38 | 1.2 | 4.8 |
| At least one peer reports binging 2 or more times | |||||
| Peer binge – high cut-off | None | 0.36 | 1.72 | 0.9 | 3.3 |
| At least two peers report binging 2 or more times | |||||
Some includes almost never/sometimes/often/always.