Table 3.
Use of fidelity frameworks/tools
| Number (%) | |
|---|---|
| 2011 Updated NIHBCC Treatment Fidelity Framework [16] | 26 (10.1) |
| Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity | 26 (10.1) |
| 2004 NIHBCC Treatment Fidelity Framework [15] | 19 (7.4) |
| Unsure/do not know | 6 (2.3) |
| Comprehensive Intervention Fidelity Guide [24] | 5 (1.9) |
| Other | 15 (5.8) |
| Medical Research Council Guidance on Process Evaluation of Complex Interventions [40] | 3 (1.2) |
| TIDieR checklist | 2 (0.8) |
| Developed specifically for study | 1 (0.4) |
| Multiple “ad hoc” publications consulted | 1 (0.4) |
| RE-AIM framework [41] | 1 (0.4) |
| Framework/Taxonomy of Implementation [42] | 1 (0.4) |
| Precede-Proceed [43] | 1 (0.4) |
| Conceptual Framework of Implementability [44] | 1 (0.4) |
| Process Evaluation “How-to” Guide [45] | 1 (0.4) |
| BCT Taxonomy v1 [46] | 1 (0.4) |
| Karas and Plankis 2016 [47] | 1 (0.4) |
| Durlak and DuPre 2008 [48] | 1 (0.4) |
| SPIRIT Intervention Fidelity Assessment Tool [49] | 1 (0.4) |
NIHBCC National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium, BCT behaviour change techniques, TIDieR Template for intervention description and replication, RE-AIM Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance