Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 13;9:879. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00879

Table 3.

Financial information concerning the various companies developing or commercializing GBM treatments, extracted from the 2017 annual report of these companies.

Co name Year founded Location (HQ) 2016 Revenue (MS, 2016) Net income/Loss (MS, 2016) Accumulated losses (MS) No. of employees 2016 R & D (% GBM) (MS, 2016) Gal & Admin (MS, 2016) Market value (MS, 2018)
Agenus 1994 Lexington (USA) 22 −127 905 255 94 (8% GBM) 33 516
Celldex 2005 Hampton (USA) 7 −128 719 210 103 (10% GBM) 36 317
CytRx 1985 San Francisco (USA) 0.2 −51 416 27 36 (<10% GBM) 16 243
Deciphera Pharma 2003 Waltham (USA) 0 −12 176 42 14 (<15% GBM) 4 57
DelMar Pharma 2009 Vancouver (Canada) 0 −9 41 4 5 (100% GBM) 3 23
Elekta 1972 Stockholm (Sweden) 11 0.1 N.A. 3,600 0.15 (>50% GBM) 0.09 N.A.
Immuno-cellular 1987 Los Angeles (USA) 0 −27 96 7 19 (100% GBM) 5 4.2
Midatech 2000 Oxford (UK) 6.4 −20 59 84 6.7 (15–30%) 9 22
Northwest biotherapeutics 1996 Bethesda (USA) 0.6 −80 715 15 60 (100% GBM) 11 N.A.
Novocure 2000 Jersey Isle 83 −131 520 450 41 (20% GBM) 51 N.A.
Noxxon 1997 Berlin (Germany) 0.083 −11 129 10 5 (<20% GBM) 4 12.3
Roche 1896 Basel (Switzerland) 54,000 8,825 NA 94,000 10,400 (<5% GBM) NA 190,988
Tocagen 2007 San Diego (USA) 0.031 −28 156 61 21 (100% GBM) 6 215

The year of creation of these companies, the location of their headquarter, their revenues in 2016, their net incomes or losses in 2016, their accumulated losses since their foundation, their number of employees in 2016, their amount of spending in R&D in 2016 with the estimated percentage of this spending dedicated to GBM research, their administrative and general spending in 2016, as well as the market value of these companies in 2016, are indicated. The market value was estimated by multiplying the value of the share by the number of shares for each of these companies. The percentage of R&D spending dedicated to GBM research was estimated by dividing the number of GBM drugs by the total number of drugs developed/commercialized by each of these companies. This estimate relies on the analysis of the 2017 annual report of these companies, possibly not mentioning some drug developments, hence possibly leading to overestimate/underestimate of this percentage.