Table 1.
Study | N | Country | Histologic types | Scoring system | Sensitivity | Specificity | Note for positivity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mino-Kenudson 201038 | 153 | USA | Adenocarcinoma | Binary | 100 | 99.0 | |
Martinez 201347 | 79 | Spain | NSCLC | Binary (cutoff 10%) | 83.3 | 100 | |
Minca 201348 | 249 | USA | NSCLC | Binary | 100 | 100 | Corrected in accordance with the results of the second FISH and clinicopathologic data |
Ying 201349 | 196 | China | Adenocarcinoma | 0–3+ | 100 | 95.0 | >1+ |
Zhou 201458 | 368 | China | Adenocarcinoma | 0–3+ | 100 | 98.8 | >2+, corrected in accordance with the results of RT-PCR |
Shan 201454 | 286 | China | Adenocarcinoma | 0–2+ based on intensity (0–3+) and extent (0–5+) | 100 | 98.8 | >1+, corrected in accordance with the results of RT-PCR |
Le Quesne 201453 | 15 | UK | Adenocarcinoma | Intensity (0–3+) and extent (0–5+) | 100 | 86 | Only FISH-positive cases, intensity ≥1 and extent ≥4 |
Tantraworasin 201455 | 267 | Thailand | NSCLC | Binary | 80 | 94.9 | Only strongly positive staining |
Demidova 201452 | 36 | Russia | NSCLC | 0–3+ | 100 | 100 | >1+ |
Ali 2014*50 | 523 | Italy | NSCLC | Binary | 90 | 100 | RT-PCR for EML4–ALK variants 1–3 was negative in the two FISH+/IHC− cases |
Conde 201451 | 103 | Spain | NSCLC | 0–3+ | 98 | 100 | >2+ |
Wang 2014*56 | 430 | China | Adenocarcinoma | Binary | 100 | 98.2 | |
Wynes 201557 | 103 | USA | NSCLC | Binary | 90 | 95 | |
Pekar-Zlotin 201560 | 51 | Israel | Adenocarcinoma | 0–3+ | 100 | 97.7 | H score ≥40, corrected in accordance with the results of NGS |
Rogers 201561 | 362 | Australia | NSCLC | Intensity (0–3+) and extent (0–3+) | 100 | 99.7 | |
Lantuejoul 201559 | 547 | France | Adenocarcinoma | 0–3+ | 89 | 76 | ≥10% of the cells with a 1–3+ intensity, corrected in accordance with the results of RT-PCR |
Savic 201562 | 72 | Switzerland | NSCLC | 0–3+ | 96 | 100 | >3+ |
Ilie 2015*26 | 176 | France | Adenocarcinoma | Binary | 81 | 99 | The five FISH+/IHC− cases were FISH borderline positive (15%–20%); three overexpressed c-MET and responded to crizotinib, and two without c-MET expression progressed on crizotinib |
Wang 201639 | 595 | China | Adenocarcinoma | 0–3+ | 75.9 | 99.8 | >1+ |
Thorne-Nuzzo 2017*64 | 933 | Global (clinical trial) | NSCLC | Binary | 86.0 | 96.3 | Overall response rate to crizotinib: 86.7% for FISH+/IHC+ and 33.3% for FISH+/IHC− cases (P=0.0083) |
Wagle 2017*65 | 200 | India | Adenocarcinoma | Binary | 100 | 90.5 | |
Murthy 2017*63 | 341 | India | Adenocarcinoma | Binary | 100 | 94.4 | |
Kheng 201866 | 304 | UK | NSCLC | Binary | 100 | 96.6 |
Note:
Studies in which the ALK (D5F3) CDx immunohistochemistry assay or an equivalent assay was used in conjunction with a binary scoring algorithm.
Abbreviations: ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization; IHC, immunohistochemistry; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; RT-PCR, real-time polymerase chain reaction.