Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203671

Table 3. Prevalence of Anisakis sensitization according to different study samples and diagnostic tests.

Author, year, (reference) Sample characteristics Sample size (n)
age range (mean, SD)
Skin Prick Tests
% (n), >3 mm threshold
ELISA/ImmunoCAP
% (n), threshold
Other tests / criteria
General asymptomatic population (15 studies)
Abattouy, 2013 Random samples 333 - 5.1% -
Del Rey Moreno, 2006 Healthy blood donors 77 - 22.1%
(n = 17)
Immunoblot
67.5%
recognized antigens of A. simplex
Figueiredo, 2013 Healthy military 67 - 20.9%
(n = 14)
-
Frezzolini, 2010 Healthy subjects 20 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% CD63 BAT
Garcia, 1997 Healthy blood donors 51 19.6%
(n = 10)
27.4% Immunoblot 1
75.0% type 4
1.9% (n = 1) type 1
15.0% type 3
García-Palacios, 1996 Random sera 1,008 - 6.0%
(n = 61)
-
Garcia-Perez, 2015 Healthy controls 47 - 6.4% IgA1, rAni s 1; 10.6% IgA1, rAni s 5 -
Guillén-Bueno, 1999 Asymptomatic adults 251 - 18.3% Immunoblot
E17, 50-70-250 kDa eosinophilia, leukocytosis
Lin, 2012 Blood donors 100 - 2.0% ImmunoCAP > 0.35 kU/L -
Lin, 2014 Blood donors 993 - 0.4% ImmunoCAP
(0.0% ELISA with rAni s 1 and rAni s 7)
Immunoblot 40–100 kDa
(weaker bands)
Mladineo, 2014 Random healthy 500 - 2.0% indirect ELISA
Ani s 1 s 7
-
Puente, 2008 Healthy residents 264 (18–65 years) - 11.7% UA3 Ani s 7 -
Purello-D’Ambrosio, 2000 Healthy donors not occupationally exposed 15 6.6% (n = 1) 0.0% (n = 0) RAST -
Valinas, 2001 Healthy blood donors 2,801 - 0.4% UA3 -
Ventura, 2013 Healthy controls 187 16.0% - -
Occupationally exposed population, symptomatic and asymptomatic (3 studies)
Mazzucco, 2012 94 workers in fisheries sector: fishmongers (n = 21), fish industry emplooyees (n = 35), Fishermen/sailors (n = 38) 94 - 11.7%
(n = 11)
UniCAP-100
-
Nieuwenhuizen, 2006 workers employed in 2 large fish-processing workplaces in the Western Cape province of South Africa 578 8.0%
(n = 46)
- -
Purello-D’Ambrosio, 2000 Fishermen/fishmongers occupationally exposed group 28 46.4%
(n = 13)
RAST
50.0%
(n = 14)
-
Symptomatic population with allergies to any kind of allergen (24 studies)
Anadon, 2010 Food allergic;
controls non food-related allergic
493 food allergic;
25 controls non food-related allergic.
- CAP-FEIA: 52.7%
(n = 195 true positive
+ 65 false positive)
3 false negative;
ELISA rAni s 1 s 7:
40.2% (n = 198)
0 false positive
0 false negative
-
Añíbarro, 2007 Food allergic 436 12.4% 2 12.4% 2 -
Asero, 2009 Food allergic 1,110 (12–79 years) - - 0.3% prevalence of systemic reactions/ anaphylaxis
Bernardini, 2000 Suspect allergy 805 (0.5–17.6 years) 6.1% (n = 49) - -
Caballero, 2012 Sample A: suspect allergy other than fish related; sample B: Anisakis allergic patients (anaphylaxis, angioedema, urticaria or gastrointestinal symptoms few hours after eating undercooked fish) Sample A: 99; sample B: 35 Sample A: 18.0%; sample B: 100% ImmunoCAP: sample A: 17.0%; sample B: 100% Immunoblot rAni s 1,3,5,9,10: sample A: 15.0%; sample B: 100%
Consortium AAITO-IFIACI
Anisakis, 2011
Suspect allergy 10,570 4.5% (n = 474) - Anamnesis + exclusion fish allergy: 0.6% overall; 14.0% of sensitized
Daschner, 2005 Chronic urticaria 135 48.1% (combined SPT+ and IgE+) 52.6% (only IgE+)
31.8% (only IgG4)
-
Del Pozo, 1997 Urticaria/angioedema (AE) or anaphylaxis 100 14.0% 22.0% (>0.7 kU/L) + symptoms < 6 h after fish ingestion + exclusion other causes: 8.0%
real allergy to Anisakis
Estrada Rodriguez, 1997 Asthmatic/urticaria 66 - 19.7% (n = 13) -
Falcao, 2008 Relapsing acute urticaria 200 16.5% 6.0% (>0.7 kU/L IgE); 9.0% (>0.35 kU/L IgE) Combinations SPT IgE: 2.5% (SPT and >0.7 IgE);
3.0% (SPT and >0.35 IgE);
20.0% (SPT or> 0.7 IgE);
22.5% (SPT or >0.35 IgE)
Frezzolini, 2010 Chronic urticarial,
atopic patients
57 chronic urticarial; 22 atopic patients 63.0% chronic urticarial; 14.0% atopic patients 61.0% (> 0.35 kU/L)
chronic urticarial; 18.0% atopic patients
CD63 BAT 67.0%
combined 75%
chronic urticarial;
0.0% atopic patients
Garcia, 1997 Subjects with IgE against Anisakis divided into: allergic
(anamnesis, the time interval <4 hours between the ingestion of fish and the onset of the reaction, and the exclusion of other causes of allergy); non allergic (had not eaten any fish 12 hours before the onset of the symptoms); doubtful
(who did not remember the previous ingestion of fish or for whom the interval between ingestion and onset of symptoms was between 4 and 12 hours)
61 overall (25 allergic; 16 non allergic; 20 doubtful) 92.0% allergic;
50.0% non allergic; 70.0% doubtful
CAP-radioimmunoassay
100% 3 overall;
100% 3 allergic;
100% 3 non allergic; 100% 3 doubtful
Immunoblot 1: allergic: 80.0% type 1 pattern,
8.0% type 3; non allergic: 12.5% (n = 2) type 1,
56.3% (n = 9) type 4, 19.0% type 3; doubtful: 40.0% type 1, 35.0% type 3
Gomez, 1998 Suspected allergy 147 10.0% 2 10.0% 2 -
González de Olano, 2007 Mastocytosis: adults (18–65 years); children
(7 months-14 years)
163 adults; 47 children - 26.9% (n = 44) adults; 0.0% (n = 0) children symptoms referred
13.6% (n = 6) adults; 0.0% (n = 0) children
Gonzalez Munoz, 2005 Suspect allergy
subdivided into:
Anisakis allergy;
chronic urticaria or
abdominal pain unrelated to fish ingestion; healthy controls
88 overall; 37 Anisakis allergy;
51 chronic urticaria or
abdominal pain unrelated to fish ingestion; 12 healthy controls
- 42.0% (n = 37)
had a clinical history of A. simplex allergy confirmed by IgE+
CD63 BAT
Anisakis+ vs Anisakis- and Anisakis + vs
healthy controls, the cutoff for a positive basophil activation test was 21% (specificity = 96%, sensitivity =
100%), and 16% (sensitivity and specificity of 100%) respectively
Heffler, 2016 Allergic clinic outpatients 3,419 15.0% - 0.8% + allergic symptoms after raw fish
Kimura, 1999 Urticaria or food allergy 2,108 - 29.8% (n = 629) (>0.7 kU/L IgE) -
Lin, 2012 Serum samples from
Allergy laboratory: sample A without any
additional information on analytical results; sample B Phadiatop+ subjects
600 sample A; 198 sample B - ImmunoCAP (> 0.35 kU/L); 2.2% sample A; 6.6% sample B -
Lin, 2014 Subjects with total IgE levels ≥1000 kU/L 414 - 16.2% (0.2% ELISA with rAni s 1 and rAni s 7) Immunoblot
five bands ranging between 40 and 100 kDa to A. simplex CE
Montoro, 1997 Patients with acute recidivous urticaria who usually eat fish or other seafood. 25 64.0% (n = 16) 76.0% (n = 19) Immunoblot
56.0% (14 of the 25) tested sera showed the characteristic band at 49.8–80 kDa compared to the E17 reference serum. Most of the sera showed a common immunorecognition pattern with a group of bands at 200–80 kDa
Pascual, 1996 Patients with
increased levels of
serum total IgE divided into: shellfish allergy; fish allergy; probable parasitic disease;
respiratory allergy
73 overall; 16 shellfish allergy; 20 fish allergy; 17 probable parasitic disease; 20
respiratory allergy
- 56.2% (n = 41) overall; 81.3% shellfish allergy;
40.0% fish allergy;
58.8% probable parasitic disease;
50.0% respiratory allergy
-
Puente, 2008 Allergic residents with negative skin prick test to Anisakis 86 0.0% 3 3.5% UA3 Ani s 7 -
Rodriguez, 2000 Drug allergic patients 53 54.7% (n = 29) - -
Ventura, 2013 Chronic urticaria 213 49.7% - -
Hospital presenting patients for any reason (5 studies)
Andreu-Ballester, 2008 Non appendectomized controls presenting at emergency department 80 - 1.3% IgG+; 7.5% IgM+; 3.8% IgA+;
5.0% IgE+
-
Falcao, 2008 Controls selected for
programmed orthopaedic, maxillofacial, or general surgery
200 (6–18 years) 5.5% 1.5% (>0.7 kU/L IgE); 3.0% (>0.35 kU/L IgE) Combinations SPT ± IgE: 0.5% (SPT+ and >0.7 kU/L IgE); 1.5% (SPT+ and >0.35 kU/L IgE); 6.5% (SPT+ or > 0.7 kU/L IgE); 7.0% (SPT or >0.35 kU/L IgE)
Kim 2011 Subjects presenting at hospital for routine controls 498 - 5.0% larval Anisakis crude extract; 6.6%
excretory-secretory proteins
Immunoblot
A specific protein band of 130 kDa was detected from 10 patients with western blot analysis against crude extract and excretory-secretory proteins among those who showed positive results by ELISA
Puente, 2008 Non-digestive nonallergic
pathologies unrelated to anisakiosis
50 - 16.0% UA3 Ani s 7 -
Uga, 1996 Diarrhea /routine check-up without symptoms 244 - 11.0% -
Patients with digestive system disorders (6 studies)
Andreu-Ballester,2008 Cases appendectomized 80 - 2.5% IgG+; 2.5% IgM+; 1.3% IgA+;
2.5% IgE+;
-
Garcia-Perez, 2015 Cases gastrointestinal cancer 47 - 38.3% IgA1+, rAni s 1, 42.6% IgA1+, rAni s 5 -
Gomez, 1998 Sample A: eosinophilic gastroenteritis; sample B: digestive disorder different from eosinophilic gastroenteritis Sample A: 10; Sample B: 10 Sample A: 80.0%3 Sample B: 10.0%3 Sample A: 80.0%3; Sample B: 10.0%3 -
Guillen Bueno, 1999 Crohn disease 73 - 29.0% specific total Ig (G+M+A)
44.0% IgG+;
18.0% IgM+;
53.0% IgA+
Immunoblot:
human anisakidosis reference serum (E17); 50 and 250 kDa, with a band of about 70 kDa
Gutierrez, 2002 19 digestive
Haemorrhaging;
30 Crohn’s disease;
4 digestive cancer;
5 appendicitis
57 (42.38 ± 17.60 years) - Crude Extract:
Igs-CE 89.4%;
IgG-CE 75.4%;
IgM- CE 26.3%;
IgA- CE 63.1%;
IgE- CE 14.0%;
Excretory- Secretory antigens:
Igs- ES 49.1%;
IgG- ES 57.8%;
IgM- ES 22.8%;
IgA- ES 57.8%
Immunoblot
24.0% and 48.0% of sera from patients with symptoms of Crohn’s disease and digestive haemorrhaging, respectively, showed a positive immunorecognition pattern of CE antigen.
Toro, 2004 Dyspeptic symptoms 174 - 13.8% (n = 24)
IgE anti Ani s 1
-
Post-partum women (1 study)
Figueiredo, 2015 170 from high-risk birth unit and 139 from a low-risk birth unit 309 - 19.4% (n = 60) IgG+ -

1 Pattern types: type 1: group of several bands of medium molecular weight (MW) (30 to 50 kd) and others of low MW (14 to 30 kd); type 2: two or more bands of medium MW; type 3: only one band of medium MW (about 40 kd); type 4: negative blot without any band.

2 It is not specified whether each subject was tested with both IgE detection and SPT or only one diagnostic technique.

3 The prevalence rate is the result of an inclusion criterion of the study.