Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0204348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204348

Table 3. Gene classification values and ranking (in parenthesis) according to the four algorithms analyzed and the general rank generated by the BruteAgreeg for experiments 1 (E1) and 2 (E2).

1st and 2nd are the rank after running the BruteAgreeg twice.

Gene BestKeeper
Power of the gene
DeltaCt
Mean StdDev
NormFinder
S-value
geNorm
M-value
BruteAgreeg
E1 E2
E1 E2 E1 E2 E1 E2 E1 E2 1st 2nd 1st 2nd
HMBS 1.334 (1) 0.000 (1) 1.202 (4) 0.811 (5) 0.542 (4) 0.205 (4) 0.659 (3) 0.478 (2) 3 3 3 4
RPL19 1.386 (2) 1.242 (4) 1.145 (2) 0.796 (4) 0.477 (2) 0.220 (6) 0.620 (2) 0.478 (1) 1 1 2 2
H3F3A 1.393 (3) 5.416 (10) 1.214 (5) 1.081 (10) 0.551 (5) 0.270 (9) 0.620 (1) 1.097 (10) 4 2 10 10
RPL32 1.632 (4) 1.549 (6) 1.157 (3) 0.871 (6) 0.434 (1) 0.192 (3) 0.736 (4) 0.646 (6) 2 4 6 6
TOP2B 2.244 (5) 0.963 (2) 1.259 (6) 0.909 (8) 0.498 (3) 0.321(10) 0.884 (5) 0.599 (5) 5 5 7 7
RPL13A 2.325 (6) 2.485 (7) 1.338 (7) 0.724 (3) 0.633 (6) 0.118 (1) 0.995 (6) 0.761 (7) 6 6 5 5
SDHA 2.351 (7) 4.652 (9) 1.376 (8) 1.023 (9) 0.660 (7) 0.264 (8) 1.089 (7) 1.081 (9) 7 7 9 9
EEF1A1 2.742 (8) 4.002 (8) 1.584 (9) 0.897 (7) 0.900 (8) 0.217 (5) 1.192 (8) 1.001 (8) 9 9 8 8
YHWAZ 3.204 (9) 1.225 (3) 1.141 (1) 0.715 (2) 1.175 (9) 0.238 (7) 1.348 (9) 0.566 (4) 8 8 4 3
PPIA - 1.422 (5) - 0.701 (1) - 0.218 (2) - 0.492 (3) - - 1 1