Table 1.
Optimization of reaction conditions.
| Entry | 2a (equiv.) |
Pyrrolidine (equiv.) |
Base | Solvent | T (°C) |
t (min) |
Yield of 3a (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 189 | 30 | 16b |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 189 | 180 | 22b |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMF | 120 | 30 | 22c |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | NMP | 200 | 30 | 55c |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 200 | 30 | 93c |
| 6 | 1 | 2 | DBU | DMSO | 200 | 30 | 30c |
| 7 | 1 | 2 | NaOH | DMSO | 200 | 30 | 80c |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 200 | 30 | 30c |
| 9 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 180 | 30 | 71c |
| 10 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 220 | 30 | 83c |
| 11 | 1 | 2 | K2CO3 | DMSO | 200 | 20 | 70c |
a The yields were determined by HPLC and LC–MS spectroscopy of the crude reaction mixture.
b The reactions were carried out with stirring under refluxing in an oil bath.
c The reactions were carried out with stirring under microwave irradiation.