Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 18;21(15):2893–2906. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001660

Table 5.

Point estimates and marginal demand effects in households with 6–23-month-old children from Faisalabad and Hyderabad districts, Pakistan

Log(demand) Demand (g/week)
Current buyers Potential buyers
Dependent variable Mean se Mean se
(a) Point estimates
Price (per 25 g) −0·058* 0·009 −9·33* 2·18
Price (per 25 g)×SES 0·003* 0·001 −1·71* 0·53
Mean current demand 185·9 0·00
Mean price paid (per 25 g) 20·6 0·00
Number of observations 610 297
Adjusted R 2 0·153 0·161
P value (F statistic) 0·00 0·00
(b) Marginal effects (g/week)
mfxSES1 10·47* 1·59 11·03* 1·77
mfxSES2 9·92* 1·39 12·74* 1·46
mfxSES3 8·61* 1·09 14·45* 1·30
mfxSES4 7·52* 0·86 16·15* 1·35
mfxSES5 7·50* 0·76 17·86* 1·59
mfxSES6 7·56* 0·69 19·56* 1·95
mfxSES7 8·65* 0·78 21·27* 2·37
mfxSES8 5·92* 0·60 22·98* 2·84
mfxSES9 5·60* 0·72 24·68* 3·32
mfxSES10 4·02* 0·70 26·39* 3·82

SES, socio-economic status; FPCF, fortified packaged complementary foods; PKR, Pakistani Rupee.

The table shows the results of the first difference model as specified in equations (1) and (2). Part (a) reports the point estimates of the price effect and the price effect by SES on the quantity demanded. Part (b) shows the marginal demand effects for a price decrease of a 25 g sachet of FPCF by 1 PKR (corresponding to an increase of 4–5 %).

*

Denotes statistical significance on the 1 % level.