Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 21.
Published in final edited form as: Patch Based Tech Med Imaging (2016). 2016 Sep 22;9993:1–8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47118-1_1

Table 1.

The DICE (average ± standard deviation, in %) and ASD (average ± standard deviation, in mm) of segmentation results by four comparison methods for 2-week-old, 3-month-old, 6-month-old, 9-month-old and 12-month-old data.

Time-point Metric Majority voting [6] Sparse labeling [7] Spatial-temporal hypergraph labeling
Degraded Full
2-week-old DICE 50.18 ± 18.15 (8e−3)* 63.93 ± 8.20 (6e−2) 64.09 ± 8.15 (9e−2) 64.84 ± 9.33
ASD 1.02 ± 0.41 (8e−3)* 0.78 ± 0.23 (1e−2)* 0.78 ± 0.23 (1e−2)* 0.74 ± 0.26
3-month-old DICE 61.59 ± 9.19 (3e−3)* 71.49 ± 4.66 (7e−2) 71.75 ± 4.98 (1e−1) 74.04 ± 3.39
ASD 0.86 ± 0.25 (6e−3)* 0.66 ± 0.14 (5e−2)* 0.66 ± 0.15 (9e−2) 0.60 ± 0.09
6-month-old DICE 64.85 ± 7.28 (2e−4)* 72.15 ± 6.15 (5e−3)* 72.78 ± 5.68 (4e−2)* 73.84 ± 6.46
ASD 0.85 ± 0.23 (1e−4)* 0.71 ± 0.19 (3e−3)* 0.70 ± 0.17 (4e−2)* 0.67 ± 0.20
9-month-old DICE 71.82 ± 4.57 (6e−4)* 75.18 ± 2.50 (2e−3)* 75.78 ± 2.89 (9e−3)* 77.22 ± 2.77
ASD 0.73 ± 0.16 (9e−4)* 0.65 ± 0.07 (1e−3)* 0.64 ± 0.09 (9e−3)* 0.60 ± 0.09
12-month-old DICE 71.96 ± 6.64 (8e−3)* 75.39 ± 2.87 (7e−4)* 75.96 ± 2.85 (1e−2)* 77.45 ± 2.10
ASD 0.67 ± 0.10 (6e−3)* 0.64 ± 0.08 (2e−3)* 0.64 ± 0.07 (1e−2)* 0.59 ± 0.07
*

Indicates significant improvement of spatial-temporal hypergraph method over other compared methods with p-value < 0.05