Table 2. Factors associated with adherence to hospital guidelines regarding undernutrition monitoring (second step: Re-checking prealbumin levels), department of internal medicine of the Lausanne university hospital, 2013 and 2014.
Characteristics | Bivariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | P-value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
P-value | |
Admission year | ||||
2013 | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | ||
2014 | 0.88 (0.54–1.44) | 0.61 | 1.07 (0.63–1.84) | 0.79 |
Gender | ||||
Men | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | ||
Women | 0.75 (0.49–1.15) | 0.19 | 0.72 (0.45–1.16) | 0.17 |
Age category | ||||
18–59 | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | ||
60–79 | 0.71 (0.26–1.91) | 0.49 | 0.73 (0.24–2.23) | 0.58 |
80+ | 0.60 (0.23–1.55) | 0.29 | 0.73 (0.25–2.18) | 0.57 |
p-value for trend* | 0.24 | 0.31 | ||
Main diagnosis | ||||
Miscellaneous | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | ||
Circulatory system diseases | 1.44 (0.77–2.69) | 0.25 | 0.90 (0.43–1.89) | 0.79 |
Cancer | 1.92 (0.88–4.20) | 0.10 | 0.99 (0.38–2.58) | 0.98 |
Digestive system diseases | 1.92 (0.69–5.35) | 0.21 | 1.89 (0.58–6.13) | 0.29 |
Infectious diseases | 0.81 (0.35–1.86) | 0.61 | 0.52 (0.21–1.27) | 0.15 |
Mental & behavioral disorder/ Nervous system disease | 2.43 (1.09–5.43) | 0.03 | 1.88 (0.80–4.42) | 0.14 |
Respiratory system diseases | 1.28 (0.66–2.48) | 0.46 | 0.94 (0.45–1.98) | 0.87 |
NRS-2002 categories | ||||
Medium (3–4) | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | ||
High (>4) | 1.64 (1.02–2.65) | 0.043 | 1.45 (0.85–2.48) | 0.17 |
Charlson comorbidity index | ||||
Low (CCI<2) | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | ||
High (CCI≥2) | 1.71 (1.12–2.62) | 0.014 | 1.73 (1.00–2.98) | 0.050 |
Any nutritional management | ||||
No | 1 (ref.) | 1 (ref.) | ||
Yes | 3.90 (2.35–6.47) | <0.001 | 3.98 (2.33–6.78) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: ref., reference category; CCI, Charlson comorbidity index; NRS-2002, nutrition risk screening 2002. Analyses were performed among patients with NRS-2002≥3, first-prealbumin levels<0.2 g/l and length of hospital stay ≥10 days (n = 346/439). Results are presented as OR (95% CI). Bivariate analysis performed using logistic regression in which adherence to the guideline (yes or no) was the outcome and each characteristic was the predictor; multivariable analysis performed using logistic regression adjusting for all variables in the table.
* P-values for trend are computed using orthogonal polynomial contrasts (command contrast p. of Stata).