Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;13(9):e0204408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204408

Table 7. Effect of PSB inoculation on P uptake ofwheat and soil nutrients in field trials.

Site Treatment Plant Seed P content
(%)
Soil available P (μg g-1 soil) Soil Phosphatase Activity
(μmoles g-1 soil hr-1)
Soil Potassium Content
(μg g-1 soil)
Soil Sodium content
(μg g-1 soil)
Peshawar,
KPK province
Inoculated 2.20±0.08 a 2.10±0.09 a 25.43±0.08 a 40.95±1.95 a 42.47±1.16 a
Control 80% 1.99±0.11 b 1.56±0.13 c 21.55±0.11 c 34.45±0.81 b 30.27±0.59 b
Control 100% 2.14±0.02 ab 1.84±0.16 b 22.02±0.02 b 33.54±1.56 b 31.67±0.47 b
Faisalabad,
Punjab province
Inoculated 3.84±0.11 a 1.99±0.07 a 21.24±0.22 a 33.67±2.15 ab 39.64±0.58 a
Control 80% 3.34±0.06 b 1.53±0.06 b 19.30±0.91 b 34.19±1.25 a 8.820±0.66 c
Control 100% 3.68±0.06 a 1.66±0.08 b 20.25±0.80 ab 30.81±0.39 c 18.02±0.66 b

Effect of PSB on wheat P uptake and soil nutrients at Peshawar grown during winter season 2017. Data is an average of five replicates. Data was taken at 120 Days after sowing (DAS). ± represents Standard Deviation. Means with significant difference (P<0.05) among treatments is represented by different letter. Pseudomonas sp. MS16 (1 x109 CFU mL-1) was seed-inoculated before sowing. Inoculated plots were supplemented with 80% of recommended dose of DAP fertilizer.