Table 2.
Author | Represent activeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Ascertainment of outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | Adequacy of follow up of cohort | Total scores |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
Iribarren, 2004 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 9 |
Marco, 2005 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | ★⋆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Schanen, 2005 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Bellia, 2007 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | ★⋆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Onufrak, 2008 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | 7 |
Hyun, 2012 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★⋆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Chung(ACS), 2014 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | 8 |
Chung(Stroke)m 2014 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | 8 |
Matthew, 2015 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Yunus, 2015 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ⋆ | ★★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
See quality assessment in methods for explanation of ratings.