Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Mar 21;185:906–925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.042

Table 2.

Representative registration methods for infant brain images.

Study Dataset Modality Applied infant ages Method
(a) Intensity-based approaches
(Wei et al., 2017) 24 infants (leave-two-out validation) T1w or T2w 2 W to 12 M, 3 M to 12 M, 6 M to 12 M, 9 M to 12 M Learning based method using random forest and auto-context
(Wang et al., 2014c) 9 infants (leave-one-out validation) T1w or T2w 2 W to 6 M, 6 M to 12 M Sparse learning based method
(Wu et al., 2015) 24 infants (leave-one-out validation) T1w or T2w 2 W to 12 M, 3 M to 12 M, 6 M to 12 M, 9 M to 12 M Longitudinal-image-guided correspondence detection
(b) Segmentation-based approaches
(Wang et al., 2012a) 28 infants T1w, T2w, FA 2 W, 3 M, 6 M, 9 M, 12 M Tissue maps based method
(Shi et al., 2010a) 10 infants (leave-one-out validation) T1w and T2w Neonate, 1 Y, 2 Y Tissue maps based method
(Ha et al., 2011) 10 infants T1w Neonate to 2 Y Tissue maps and geometric descriptors based method
(c) Hybrid approaches
(Dong et al., 2017) 10 infants (leave-two -out validation) T1w and T2w 2 W to 12 M, 3 M to 12 M, 6 M to 12 M, 2 W to3 M, 2 W to 6 M, 3 M to 6 M Joint segmentation and registration

(W: weeks; M: months; Y: years; GA: gestational age)