Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2018 Mar 21;185:906–925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.042

Table 3.

Representative works for infant brain ROI labeling.

Study Dataset Modality ROIs
from
adult?		 ROI
NO.		 Method
(a) Whole brain labeling
(Gousias et al., 2008) 33 infants at 2 Y T1w Yes 83 Multi-atlas + majority voting
(Gousias et al., 2010) 13 infants at 1 Y T1w Yes 83 Multi-atlas + majority voting
(Gousias et al., 2012) 15 preterm and 5 term infants T1w, T2w No 50 Manual delineation
(Gousias et al., 2013) T1w, T2w No 50 Multi-atlas + majority voting
(Makropoulos et al., 2014) T1w, T2w No 50 Multi-atlas + EM based labeling fusion
(Blesa et al., 2016) 33 neonates T1w, T2w Yes 107 Atlas + intermediate time points registration
(Alexander et al., 2017) 10 neonates T1w, T2w Yes 100 Manual delineation
(b) Specific ROI labeling
(Guo et al., 2014) 10 infants, each at 1, 3, 6, 9 M T1w, T2w No hippoca mpus Multi-atlas + multi-modal features based label fusion
(Dong et al., 2015) 10 infants, each at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 M T1w, T2w No hippoca mpus Multi-atlas multi-modal + hypergraph based label fusion
(Guo et al., 2016) 10 infants, each at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 M T1w No hippoca mpus Multi-atlas + spatial-temporal hypergraph based label fusion

(M: months; Y: years)