Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;19:244. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1035-x

Table 4.

Effect of intravenous NaNO2 on renal sodium and water regulation

Baseline Infusion Post-infusion p Friedman/RM ANOVA (one-way)
30 min 60 min 90 min 120 min 150 min 180 min
FENa (%)
 Placebo 1.26 [1.05;1.47] 1.26 [1.09;1.43] 1.43 [1.25;1.62] 1.38 [1.24;1.52] 1.57 [1.36;1.78] 1.53 [1.34;1.73] 1.41 [1.26;1.56] .001
 Allopurinol 1.36 [0.96;1.75] 1.41 [1.05;1.76] 1.52 [1.20;1.83] 1.53 [1.22;1.83] 1.66 [1.32;2.00]* 1.69 [1.40;1.98]* 1.59 [1.33;1.85] .002
 Enalapril 1.15 [0.84;1.46] 1.30 [1.01;1.60] 1.42 [1.15;1.68]* 1.45 [1.20;1.71]* 1.59 [1.34;1.83]* 1.56 [1.32;1.81]* 1.52 [1.29;1.74]* <.001
 Acetazolamide 1.08 [0.86;1.29] 1.25 [1.01;1.49] 1.35 [1.08;1.63] 1.29 [1.07;1.51] 1.42 [1.15;1.69]* 1.44 [1.17;1.71]* 1.28 [1.05;1.52] .001
pinteraction (pretreatment x time) .535
GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)
 Placebo 98 [90;105] 104 [96;111] 98 [91;105] 105 [97;113]* 101 [92;110] 99 [93;106] 100 [91;109] .027
 Allopurinol 99 [90;108] 102 [93;112] 97 [89;105] 103 [94;112] 98 [88;108] 99 [91;107] 102 [92;111] .132
 Enalapril 101 [92;110] 104 [94;114] 101 [94;108] 104 [96;112] 100 [91;109] 102 [94;109] 102 [94;110] .568
 Acetazolamide 83 [76;89] 84 [77;92] 77 [70;83]* 83 [75;91] 83 [76;89] 83 [76;89] 85 [78;92] .012
pinteraction (pretreatment x time) .494
CH20 (ml/min)
 Placebo 4.58 [3.66;5.50] 2.87 [2.08;3.65] 1.87 [1.36;2.38]* 2.27 [1.46;3.08]* 2.85 [2.11;3.59] 2.64 [2.00;3.28]* 2.85 [2.15;3.55]* <.001
 Allopurinol 4.56 [3.64;5.48] 3.05 [2.02;4.07] 2.54 [1.82;3.27]* 2.04 [0.98;3.10]* 3.00 [2.11;3.90] 3.06 [2.19;3.93] 3.26 [2.40;4.12] .011
 Enalapril 4.82 [3.70;5.94] 3.57 [2.48;4.65] 2.28 [1.26;3.29]* 2.28 [1.48;3.08]* 3.24 [2.59;3.89] 2.23 [1.26;3.21]* 2.67 [1.71;3.63] .001
 Acetazolamide 3.91 [2.80;5.01] 1.99 [1.12;2.87] 1.69 [0.93;2.46] 1.63 [0.87;2.39]* 2.60 [1.78;3.42] 2.67 [1.78;3.55] 2.60 [1.80;3.40] .004
pinteraction (pretreatment x time) .682
P-AVP (pg/ml)
 Placebo 0.32 [0.25;0.38] 0.25 [0.20;0.30]* 0.27 [0.21;0.33]* .012
 Allopurinol 0.29 [0.21;0.36] 0.28 [0.22;0.33] 0.25 [0.21;0.29] .414
 Enalapril 0.26 [0.20;0.33] 0.21 [0.17;0.26] 0.23 [0.18;0.28] .213
 Acetazolamide 0.29 [0.22;0.36] 0.27 [0.19;0.35] 0.28 [0.22;0.34] .770
pinteraction (pretreatment x time) .630
U-AQP2 (ng/min)
 Placebo 1.26 [1.12;1.41] 1.25 [1.06;1.45] 1.23 [1.10;1.35] 1.18 [1.04;1.33] 1.23 [1.08;1.39] 1.19 [1.06;1.33] 1.13 [1.02;1.23] .167
 Allopurinol 1.45 [1.27;1.63] 1.37 [1.26;1.48] 1.31 [1.20;1.42] 1.34 [1.21;1.47] 1.33 [1.13;1.54] 1.31 [1.20;1.42] 1.28 [1.17;1.39] .080
 Enalapril 1.29 [1.13;1.44] 1.23 [1.09;1.37] 1.28 [1.14;1.42] 1.26 [1.13;1.40] 1.28 [1.09;1.46] 1.33 [1.18;1.48] 1.18 [1.06;1.31] .131
 Acetazolamide 1.30 [1.15;1.45] 1.26 [1.08;1.44] 1.21 [1.07;1.36] 1.19 [1.04;1.35] 1.25 [1.09;1.41] 1.26 [1.08;1.43] 1.21 [1.06;1.37] .363
pinteraction (pretreatment x time) .590
U-ENaCγ (ng/min)
 Placebo 0.44 (0.38;0.51) 0.44 (0.33;0.51) 0.47 (0.35;0.54) 0.45 (0.36;0.59) 0.40 (0.36;0.57) 0.43 (0.36;0.56) 0.43 (0.32;0.46) .331
 Allopurinol 0.43 (0.40;0.65) 0.42 (0.38;0.54) 0.39 (0.34;0.54) 0.47 (0.42;0.61) 0.43 (0.30;0.54)* 0.42 (0.35;0.51) 0.39 (0.34;0.50) .020
 Enalapril 0.44 (0.40;0.64) 0.40 (0.35;0.49) 0.39 (0.34;0.60) 0.45 (0.31;0.53) 0.39 (0.36;0.55) 0.41 (0.33;0.57) 0.45 (0.40;0.53) .215
 Acetazolamide 0.68 (0.48;0.95) 0.57 (0.42;1.01) 0.59 (0.45;0.94) 0.53 (0.48;0.88) 0.55 (0.45;0.93) 0.71 (0.53;0.94) 0.64 (0.49;0.89) .561

Effect of intravenous NaNO2 on fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), GFR, free water clearance (CH2O), urinary excretion rates of aquaporin-2 (AQP2) and γ-subunit of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaCγ) in 14 healthy subjects and arginine vasopressine (AVP) in 16 healthy subjects after 4 days pretreatment with allopurinol, enalapril, acetazolamide, or placebo. Normal distributed data are presented as means with 95% confidence interval in brackets and non-parametric data as medians with 25th and 75th percentiles in parentheses. Statistics were performed using one-way repeated measures (RM) ANOVA for comparing over time and two-way RM ANOVA with time and pretreatment as within factors to test for interaction. Pairwise comparison where performed using Student’s t-test. U-ENaCγ were tested using Friedman test for comparing over time and Wilcoxon’s signed rank test for pairwise comparison with placebo or baseline

* p < .05 within group vs. baseline (Bonferroni), p < .05 vs. placebo at baseline