Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;18:222. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0898-9

Table 4.

Treatment effects on duration of TUG performance (DTP), FIM and pain over time

LAT AMIS effect 95% CI p-value
n n
DTP
 Day 5 83 62 −24.4 [−40.4, −4.2] 0.022
 Week 3 79 65 −21.5 [−41.2, 4.7] 0.101
 Week 6 80 63 −16.4 [−36.9, 10.8] 0.216
 Month 3 75 58 −10.1 [−34.9, 24.2] 0.520
 Month 12 55 42 −10.3 [−40.3, 34.9] 0.604
FIM
 Day 5 93 75 3.9 [−1.8, 9.7] 0.181
 Week 3 89 72 6.7 [0.5, 12.8] 0.037
 Week 6 84 66 5.5 [−1.1, 12.2] 0.106
 Month 3 77 60 3.6 [−4.1, 11.4] 0.361
 Month 12 59 47 3.6 [−5.2, 12.4] 0.427
VAS
 Day 5 68 51 −0.8 [−1.5,-0.1] 0.026
 Week 3 86 70 −0.7 [−1.4,0.0] 0.064
 Week 6 81 63 −0.2 [− 0.8,0.3] 0.433
 Month 3 76 59 −0.4 [−0.8,0.0] 0.075
 Month 12 59 47 −0.0 [−0.5,0.4] 0.935
Back to pfFIM-level:
 Day 5 93 75 1.1 2.7 0.587
 Week 3 89 72 4.5 6.9 0.515
 Week 6 84 66 7.1 16.7 0.076
 Month 3 77 60 33.8 26.7 0.456
 Month 12 59 47 49.2 38.3 0.326

Treatment effects during the first postoperative year

Upper three panels: Effect-estimates with 95% confidence intervals and p-values for the outcomes DTP, FIM and pain at each time point. The effect for DTP is expressed as the percentage difference in median. The effect for FIM is the difference in the mean change from baseline. The effect for pain is the difference in mean VAS score. The effects refer to the difference AMIS minus LAT

Lower panel: Percentage of patients with FIM-values equal or above their pre-fracture values