Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 9;2018:5472018. doi: 10.1155/2018/5472018

Table 2.

Extracted data from studies included in the scoping review on longitudinal participation outcomes after stroke.

Author Year Country Setting Study design Measure Sample size 1st measure 2nd measure 3rd measure 4th measure Assessors Age (yr) mean (SD), median (IQR) Define participation
Altman et al. [46] 2013 USA Community Retrospective cohort of completers and noncompleters MPAI-4 Completers n = 738, noncompleters n = 150 Baseline Discharge Postdischarge (3 months) Postdischarge (12 months) Not described Completers 51.10 (11.46), noncompleters 52.96 (52.96) Operational
Awad et al. [47] 2014 USA Research laboratory Case series pretest, posttest SIS-P n = 13 Baseline Postbaseline (12 weeks) PT 61 (8.31) Self-perceived participation
Beaudoin et al. [48] 2013 Canada Community Prospective cohort study LIFE-H n = 57 Baseline Postbaseline (6 months) Postbaseline (9 months) Not described 76.9 (8.1) DCP
Bertilsson et al. [49] 2016 Sweden Inpatient and community Multicentre cluster RCT SIS-P, OGQ Client-centred n = 88, usual n = 95 Baseline Postbaseline (3 months) 12 months OT Client-centred 74.1 (9.5), usual 71.3 (10.1) ICF, meaningful activities/occupation
Brown et al. [50] 2014 Canada Community Prospective cohort study, with intervention and interrupted time series PASIPD n = 61 Baseline Postbaseline (2 months) Postbaseline (4 months) PT Intervention 65 (13), control 66 (13) Operational
Butler et al. [51] 2006 USA Community Case study: pre-post test SIS-P n = 1 Baseline Postbaseline (4 weeks) Postintervention (8 weeks) Postintervention (3 months) OT 44 ICF
Chou et al. [52] 2015 Taiwan Inpatient and community Prospective cohort study SIS-P Baseline n = 263 Baseline Postbaseline (2 weeks) OT 59.8 (13.0) Operational
Combs-Miller et al. [53] 2014 USA Research laboratory and community RCT IMPACT-P n = 20 Baseline Postintervention Postbaseline (3 months) PT Body weight-supported 56.20 (7.61), overground walking 65.50 (6.17) ICF
Demetrios et al. [54] 2014 Australia Community Nonrandomized controlled study GAS High-intensity program n = 28, usual care n = 31 Baseline Postintervention (6 weeks) Postintervention (12 weeks) Postintervention (24 weeks) Not described High-intensity 60.6 (48.6–65.9), usual care 61.4 (47.8–68.6) ICF
Desrosiers et al. [55] 2006 Canada Community Prospective cohort study LIFE-H T1 n = 102, T2 n = 66 Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (2–4 years) OT T1 68.1 (14.1), T2 67.6 (13.7) DCP
Desrosiers et al. [56] 2007 Canada Community RCT Minutes Experimental n = 29, control n = 27 Baseline Postintervention OT Experimental 70.0 (10.2), control 70.0 (12.0) DCP
Desrosiers et al. [57] 2006 Canada Community Prospective cohort study LIFE-H T1 n = 102, T2 n = 66 Postdischarge (6 months) Poststroke (2–4 years) OT T1 68.1 (14.1), T2 67.6 (13.7) DCP
Egan et al. [58] 2014 Canada Community Prospective cohort study RNL n = 67 Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (9 months) Poststroke (12 months) Poststroke (18 months) Not described 64.8 (13.3) ICF
Egan et al. [59] 2015 Canada Community Prospective cohort study RNL n = 67 Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (9 months) Poststroke (12 months) Poststroke (18 months) Not described 64.8 (13.3) ICF
Evan et al. [60] 2012 USA Community Case study pre-post test GPS n = 1 Baseline Postbaseline (4 weeks) Postbaseline (8 weeks) Postdischarge (6 and 12 months) PT 56 ICF
Flansbjer et al. [61] 2012 Sweden Community Prospective cohort study follow-up from RCT SIS-P n = 18 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (5 months) Postintervention (4 years) PT 4 years 66 (4) ICF
Flansbjer et al. [62] 2008 Sweden Community RCT SIS-P n = 24 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (5 months) PT Intervention 61 (5), control 60 (5) ICF
Guidetti et al. [63] 2015 Stockholm, Uppsala, and Gävleborg County, Sweden Community RCT SIS-P n = 280 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (12 months) OT CADL 74 (10), UADL 71 (11) Operational
Guidetti et al. [64] 2014 Stockholm, Sweden Community Comparative study no controls SIS-P n = 349 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (12 months) OT, PT 74 (14) Operational
Hamzat and Peters [65] 2009 Nigeria Community Longitudinal descriptive study LHS n = 20 Poststroke (1 month) Poststroke (2 months) Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (4 months) PT Not reported ICF
Horgan et al. [66] 2009 Ireland Community Comparative study no controls FAI n = 23 Poststroke (2 weeks) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (12 months) PT 69.7 (11.3) Operational
Ilse et al. [67] 2008 Belgium Community Comparative study no controls NEADL, mRS n = 90 Poststroke (2 months) Poststroke (4 months) Poststroke (6 months) PT 67.3 (11.2) Operational
Baert et al. [68] 2012 Belgium Inpatient Case series pretest, posttest SIS-P, NEADL n = 50 Baseline Poststroke (2 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (12 months) PT 57.2 (11.4) ICF
Jalayondeja et al. [69] 2011 Thailand Community Prospective cohort study SIS-P n = 98 Poststroke (1 month) Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Researcher/research assistant 61.9 (11.02) Operational
Jalayondeja et al. [70] 2014 Thailand Community Prospective cohort study SIS-P n = 98 Poststroke (1 month) Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Researcher/research assistant Fallers 65.4 (10.2), nonfallers 60.7 (11.2) Community participation
Kluding et al. [71] 2013 USA Community RCT SIS-P n = 197 Baseline Postintervention (6 weeks) Postintervention (12 weeks) Postintervention (30 weeks) PT Interventions 60.7 (12.2), control 61.6 (11.0) Operational
Kootker et al. [72] 2017 Netherlands Community RCT USER-P n = 61 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (4 months) Postintervention (8 months) Health psychologist CBT 61 (45–79), CCT 61 (25–76) Operational
Kutner et al. [73] 2010 USA Inpatient and community RCT SIS-P RTP n = 7, combined therapy group n = 10 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (2 months) OT, PT RTP 51.0 (11.3), combined therapy group 61.9 (13.4) Operational
Kwok et al. [74] 2011 Hong Kong Inpatient Observational cohort study LHS Baseline n = 594, 3 months n = 500, 12 months n = 433 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (12 months) Not described 72 (65–77) ICF
Laufer et al. [75] 2009 Israel Research laboratory and community Time series no control SIS-P n = 24 Baseline Postintervention (8 weeks) Postintervention (12 months) PT Study group 55.0 (14.6) Meaningful activities/occupation
Lennon et al. [76] 2006 Ireland Inpatient and community Pre-post test LHS n = 9 Poststroke (6 weeks) Discharge from physiotherapy 64.3 (9.6) Operational
Levin et al. [77] 2012 Canada + Israel Research laboratory and community Case series pre-post test MAL VR n = 8, conventional n = 6 Baseline Postbaseline (1 week) Postintervention Postintervention (1 month) OT VR 58.1 (14.6), conventional 59.8 (15.1) ICF
Lund et al. [78] 2012 Norway Community RCT SF-36 Intervention n = 39, control n = 47 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (9 months) Researcher/research assistant Intervention 75 (7.2), control 79 (6.5) Operational
Mayer and Reid [79] 2004 Canada Community Prospective longitudinal cohort study IPA n = 18 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) OT 67.4 (13.4) ICF
Mayo et al. [80] 2009 Canada and England Inpatient and community Longitudinal cohort study SIS-P n = 408 Poststroke (1 month) Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (12 months) Not described 66.5 (14.6) Operational
Mayo et al. [81] 2011 Canada Community Reanalysis of RCT SF-36 Nurse case-manager group n = 96, usual care group n = 94 Postintervention Postintervention (6 months) Not described Nurse case-manager 70 (14), usual care 72 (13) Role participation
Mayo et al. [82] 2013 Canada Community RCT SIS-P, RAND-36 Cycle group n = 43, exercise group n = 44 Baseline Postbaseline (12 months) PT Cycle 67.7 (14.4) ,exercise 67.8 (12.3) ICF, role participation
Mercer et al. [83] 2009 USA Inpatient and research laboratory Prospective cohort study SIS-P n = 33 Poststroke (1 month) Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Not described 58.7 (17.3) ICF
Nijenhuis et al. [84] 2015 Netherlands Community Comparison within subjects, longitudinal SIS-P n = 24 Baseline Postintervention (6 weeks) Biomechanical engineering 59 (13) Operational
Page et al. [85] 2015 USA Research laboratory and community Comparison within subjects longitudinal no control SIS-P n = 5 Baseline Postintervention OT 43.7 (6.43) Meaningful activities/occupation
Pang et al. [86] 2005 Canada Community RCT PASIPD n = 63 Baseline Postintervention OT, PT Intervention group 65.8 (9.1), control 64.7 (8.4) Operational
Parker et al. [87] 2001 UK Community RCT NLQ n = 466 Postintervention (6 months) Postintervention (12 months) OT Leisure 72 (65–79), ADL 71 (66–78), control 72 (65–78) Operational
Penney et al. [88] 2007 Canada Not stated Single case study IPA, 6-minute walk test n = 1 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (12 months) PT 62 ICF
Pundik et al. [89] 2012 USA Not stated Pre-post test with interrupted time series no control SIS-P n = 44 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (3 months) Not described 60 (16.8) ICF
Raghavan et al. [90] 2016 USA Community Mixed-method pre-post design with 1 year follow-up SIS-P n = 13 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (12 months) OT 52 (14) Operational
Rochette et al. [91] 2013 Canada Inpatient and community RCT LIFE-H n = 186 Baseline Postbaseline (6 months) Postintervention (12 months) OT, PT YOU CALL 63.2 (12.4), WE CALL 61.7 (12.7) DCP
Sabariego et al. [92] 2013 Germany Inpatient and community RCT SIS-P n = 260 Baseline Postintervention (1 week) Postintervention (6 months) Not described Experimental 55.3 (12.6), control 59.3 (12.7) ICF
Sandberg et al. [93] 2016 Sweden Community RCT SIS-P n = 56 Baseline Postintervention (3 months) Not described Intervention 71.3 (7.0), control 70.4 (8.1) Social participation
Segura et al. [94] 2006 Brazil Research laboratory and community Prospective, comparative, no control SIS-P n = 18 Baseline Postintervention (3 months) PT 52.9 Operational
Singam et al. [95] 2015 Sweden Inpatient Prospective, longitudinal study FAI n = 349 Poststroke (5 days) Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (12 months) OT, PT 69.4 (13.8) ICF
Stuart et al. [96] 2009 Italy Not stated Nonrandomized control trial SIS-P Intervention n = 40, control n = 38 Baseline Postintervention (6 months) Not described Intervention 66.8 (1.4), control 70.0 (1.7) Operational
Studenski et al. [97] 2005 USA Community RCT SIS-P Intervention n = 44, usual care n = 49 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (6 months) Blinded assessor Intervention 68.5 (9.0), usual care 70.4 (11.3) Operational
Teoh et al. [98] 2009 Australia Community Longitudinal cohort study SIS-P n = 135 Baseline Postbaseline (10 weeks) Postbaseline (6 months) Not described 67.5 (14.3) Social participation
Tielemans et al. [99] 2015 Netherlands Community RCT USER-P n = 113 Baseline Postintervention Postintervention (3 months) Postintervention (9 months) Researcher/research assistant Self-management 55.2 (8.9), education 58.8 (8.7) Operational
van Mierlo et al. [100] 2016 Netherlands Community Longitudinal cohort study USER-P n = 368 Poststroke (2 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (12 months) Poststroke (24 months) Researcher/research assistant 66.8 (12.3) Operational
Vincent-Onabajo et al. [101] 2014 Nigeria Research laboratory and community Case series LHS n = 83 Poststroke (1 month) Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (9 months and 12 months) Not described Male 60.7 (12.4), female 58.1 (12.6) ICF
Viscogliosi et al. [102] 2011 Canada Inpatient and community Comparative study no controls LIFE-H n = 197 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (9 months) OT 76.9 (7.0) DCP
Worrall et al. [103] 2017 Australia Inpatient and community Prospective longitudinal cohort study ALA n = 58 Poststroke (3 months) Poststroke (6 months) Poststroke (9 months) Poststroke (12 months) Not described 66.1 (13.6) ICF
Yang and Kong [104] 2013 Singapore Inpatient Prospective observational cohort study SF-36 n = 122 Baseline Predischarge OT, PT 58.2 (10.5) Operational

Note: ADL: activity of daily living; ALA: assessment for living with aphasia; DCP: disability creation process; FAI: Frenchay activity index; GAS: goal attainment scale; GPS: global positioning system; ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; IMPACT-P: participation subsection of the ICF measure of participation and activities; IPA: impact on participation and autonomy; LHS: London handicap scale; LIFE-H: assessment of life habits; MAL: motor activity log; MPAI-4: Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory; mRS: modified ranking scale; NEADL: Nottingham extended activities of daily living; NLQ: Nottingham leisure questionnaire; OGQ: occupational gaps questionnaire; PASIPD: physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities; RAND-36: physical function index of the medical outcomes study RND-36 item health survey; RCT: randomized control trial; RNL: reintegration of normal living; RTP: repetitive task practice; SF-36: short form 36; SIS-P: stroke impact scale participation domain; USER-P: Utrecht scale for evaluation of rehabilitation-participation; VR: virtual reality. Cohort studies that statistically tested for changes in participation.