Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Aug;154(2):238–248.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.037

Table I.

Demographics and statistical comparisons of Herbst and Class II control subjects

Measurement Herbst brachyfacial mean SD Herbst mesofacial mean SD Control mean SD P value
Age (y) 13.36 0.58 12.74 0.85 13.73 0.82 0.03*
Sex 4 female, 4 male - 7 female, 1 male 6 female, 5 male - -
Phase 1 duration (mo) 7.21 1.41 7.93 2.23 - - 0.46
Phase 2 duration (mo) 20.38 3.92 19.25 4.40 - - 0.60
Total treatment time (mo) 27.59 4.31 27.18 5.78 22.81 8.69 0.25
ANB (°) 6.0 0.9 5.4 1.4 3.9 2.2 0.03
Pog-N perp (mm) −2.4 4.4 −3.8 6.1 −3.8 3.6 0.83
Gonial angle (Co-Go-Me) (°) 118.1 3.9 127.1 5.6 122.8 4.9 0.003
FMPA (°) 18.3 4.1 27.9 1.4 24.5 5.0 0.0002
Class II molar relationship (mm) 6.6 1.5 6.3 1.5 4.6 1.4 0.01§
*

Significant difference at P<0.05 for Herbst mesofacial vs control group only;

Significant difference at P<0.05 for Herbst brachyfacial vs control group only;

Significant difference at P<0.05 for Herbst brachyfacial group vs Herbst mesofacial and control group;

§

Significant difference at P<0.05 for Herbst brachyfacial group and Herbst mesofacial vs control group.