Table 3.
Items1 | RFI2 | SE3 | Sex | SE4 | P-value | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Most-efficient animals | Least-efficient animals | Steers | Heifers | RFI | Sex | RFI × sex | |||
Target bacterial species | |||||||||
A. lipolytica | 1.80 × 10−4 | 9.00 × 10−5 | 0.27 | 1.20 × 10−4 | 1.30 × 10− 4 | 0.31 | 0.48 | 0.96 | 0.45 |
B. proteoclasticus | 1.91 × 10−2 | 1.12 × 10− 2 | 0.22 | 1.33 × 10− 2 | 1.60 × 10− 2 | 0.25 | 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.66 |
E. ruminantium | 9.13 × 10-2a | 4.18 × 10-2b | 0.10 | 9.09 × 10-2a | 4.20 × 10-2b | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.84 |
F. succinogenes | 2.90 × 10-4a | 1.00 × 10-4b | 0.13 | 3.00 × 10-4a | 0.90 × 10-4b | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.79 |
M. elsdenii | 7.00 × 10-5a | 3.00 × 10-5b | 0.12 | 4.00 × 10−5 | 5.00 × 10−5 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.73 | 0.35 |
P. bryantii | 4.31 × 10−2 | 3.52 × 10−2 | 0.14 | 5.37 × 10−2 | 2.82 × 10− 2 | 0.16 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.40 |
S. ruminantium | 1.25 × 10−1 | 1.17 × 10−1 | 0.08 | 1.21 × 10−1 | 1.20 × 10−1 | 0.09 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.95 |
S. amylolytica | 0.70 × 10-4b | 3.80 × 10-4a | 0.14 | 2.40 × 10−4 | 1.20 × 10−4 | 0.14 | < 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.83 |
S. bovis | 5.63 × 10−3 | 6.75 × 10−3 | 0.25 | 6.30 × 10− 3 | 6.03 × 10− 3 | 0.29 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.48 |
S. dextrinosolvens | 4.81 × 10−2 | 1.22 × 10−2 | 0.48 | 1.38 × 10− 2 | 4.26 × 10− 2 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.28 |
Bacteria density | |||||||||
The 16S rRNA gene copy numbers (log10)/ng DNA5 | 8.03b | 8.07a | 0.01 | 8.05 | 8.05 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.89 | 0.60 |
Means with different superscripts (a, b) within row represent differences among overall RFI or sex effects (P ≤ 0.05)
1Data were logit transformed to ensure normality of residuals
2RFI residual feed intake
3SE standard error of the mean for RFI effect
4SE standard error of the mean for sex effect
516S rRNA gene copy number (log10)/ng DNA