Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2018 Jul 5;23(27):1800323. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.27.1800323

Gonorrhoea treatment failure caused by a Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with combined ceftriaxone and high-level azithromycin resistance, England, February 2018

David W Eyre 1,2, Nicholas D Sanderson 2, Emily Lord 3, Natasha Regisford-Reimmer 3, Kevin Chau 2, Leanne Barker 2, Markus Morgan 3, Robert Newnham 3, Daniel Golparian 4, Magnus Unemo 4, Derrick W Crook 2,5,6, Tim EA Peto 2,6, Gwenda Hughes 5, Michelle J Cole 5, Helen Fifer 5, Anne Edwards 3,7, Monique I Andersson 3,7
PMCID: PMC6152157  PMID: 29991383

Abstract

We describe a gonorrhoea case with combined high-level azithromycin resistance and ceftriaxone resistance. In February 2018, a heterosexual male was diagnosed with gonorrhoea in the United Kingdom following sexual intercourse with a locally resident female in Thailand and failed treatment with ceftriaxone plus doxycycline and subsequently spectinomycin. Resistance arose from two mechanisms combining for the first time in a genetic background similar to a commonly circulating strain. Urgent action is essential to prevent further spread.

Keywords: gonorrhoea; treatment failure; antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial treatment, whole-genome sequencing


Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a major concern. Dual therapy with ceftriaxone and azithromycin, the last two mainstream agents to which N. gonorrhoeae remains largely susceptible, is widely recommended internationally [1]. We describe a case of urethral and pharyngeal infection with N. gonorrhoeae with combined high-level azithromycin resistance and ceftriaxone resistance. Previously no such cases have been reported.

Case description and microbiology

In February 2018, a heterosexual male presented to a sexual health clinic in the United Kingdom (UK) with a 4-day history of urethral discharge and dysuria. He reported having had sexual intercourse 3 days earlier with a regular female partner in the UK. He also reported having had sex with a locally resident female in Thailand in January 2018; he had no history of sexually transmitted infections and no other past medical history. Examination revealed a creamy white urethral discharge, with 3 + pus cells and Gram-negative intracellular diplococci seen under microscopy, leading to a diagnosis of urethral gonorrhoea infection. He was treated with a single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone 1 g and oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days.

A urine nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) was positive for N. gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis negative. N. gonorrhoeae was cultured from a urethral swab. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was undertaken by M.I.C. Evaluator Strips (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with results confirmed using Etest (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) at Public Health England, Colindale, UK and the WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and other STIs, Sweden. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing resistance breakpoints were used [2]. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of nine antimicrobials are given in Table 1 and demonstrate high-level resistance to azithromycin (> 256 mg/L) and resistance to ceftriaxone (0.5 mg/L), as well as tetracycline (32 mg/L) and ciprofloxacin (> 32 mg/L). The patient was recalled and during this visit, 13 days after starting ceftriaxone/doxycycline treatment, his symptoms had resolved and a urine NAAT was negative for N. gonorrhoeae. However, given the previous antibiotic susceptibility profile, he was treated with a single dose of intramuscular spectinomycin (2 g). At a follow-up appointment, 20 days later, a urine NAAT was negative but a pharyngeal swab (omitted accidentally at the prior visits; the patient was asymptomatic at this site) was culture-positive for N. gonorrhoeae thus fulfilling international criteria for a verified treatment failure [3] as no further contact was reported with the Thai female following initial treatment. The same MICs were obtained from both cultured isolates from the case. Following this, the patient was treated with ertapenem (1 g) intravenously for 3 days. Subsequent NAAT and culture of urethral and pharyngeal swabs a further 21 days later were negative. The patient’s regular UK partner had negative vaginal and pharyngeal swab NAATs. We were unable to contact the patient’s partner from Thailand who the patient had initially met via a dating website.

Table 1. Antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations, Neisseria gonorrhoeae case imported from Thailand to England, February 2018.

Antimicrobial MIC Interpretationa
Ceftriaxone 0.5 mg/L Resistant
Cefixime 2 mg/L Resistant
Azithromycin > 256 mg/L High-level resistant
Ciprofloxacin > 32 mg/L Resistant
Tetracycline 32 mg/L Resistant
Benzylpenicillin 1 mg/L intermediate susceptible
Spectinomycin 8 mg/L Susceptible
Gentamicin 2 mg/L No resistance breakpoint available (low value)
Ertapenem 0.032 mg/L No resistance breakpoint available (low value)

MIC: minimum inhibitory concentrations.

aEuropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing resistance breakpoints were used [2].

Antimicrobial resistance determinants and sequence analysis

By combining short-read (Illumina, San Diego, California, United States of America) and long-read (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) sequence data a complete hybrid 2.17Mb assembly for each isolate was determined, these have been deposited, together with raw sequence data, in the European Nucleotide Archive (PRJEB26560; see supplement for details). Mapping sequence reads to one of these novel reference genomes as previously described [4], the sequences of the pre-treatment urethral (G97687) and the post-initial treatment pharyngeal (G7944) isolates from the case were indistinguishable i.e. they were consistent with acquisition from the same source at both anatomical sites. The isolates had a novel N. gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) sequence type (ST), ST16848 determined in silico [4], and were assigned MLST 12039.

Antimicrobial resistance determinants were identified from the sequencing data as described previously using a combination of de novo assembly and mapping-based approaches [5]. The isolates from the case included an identical mosaic penA allele to that previously identified in the ceftriaxone-resistant FC428 strain isolated in Japan in 2015, which also had a ceftriaxone MIC of 0.5 mg/L [6]. This mosaic penA allele contains two key ceftriaxone resistance mutations, A311V and T483S, but not the T316P mutation found in the more resistant H041 strain [7]. The isolates also had the A2059G mutation in all four 23S rRNA genes – the most commonly occurring mutation responsible for high-level azithromycin resistance [8]. Additional antimicrobial resistance determinants are summarised in Table 2. The isolate had a N. gonorrhoeae Sequence Typing for Antimicrobial Resistance (NG-STAR) type of 996.

Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance determinants present in isolates, Neisseria gonorrhoeae case imported from Thailand to England, February 2018.

Gene Variant Mechanism Antimicrobials affected
23S rRNA A2059G, 4 copies Decreased macrolide binding to 50S ribosome AZM
penA FC428 mosaic penA - 100% identity Reduced β-lactam acylation of penicillin binding protein (PBP) 2 CRO, PEN
penB G120K, A121D Reduced influx through PorB1b CRO, PEN, TET
mtrR G45D, Promoter deletion Over-expression of MtrCDE efflux pump resulting in increased efflux AZM, CRO, PEN, TET
ponA L421P Reduced β-lactam acylation of PBP1 PEN
tetM Gene presence Prevents tetracycline binding to the 30S ribosome TET
rpsJ V57M Reduced affinity of 30S ribosome for tetracycline TET
gyrA S91F, D95A Reduced quinolone binding to DNA gyrase CIP
parC S87R Reduced quinolone binding to topoisomerase IV CIP

AZM: azithromycin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; CRO: ceftriaxone; PEN: benzylpenicillin; TET: tetracycline.

Resistance determinants as previously described [5] were searched for. No additional macAB, norM promoter variants; mtrR, pilQ mutations; or erm, mef, ere genes were identified. The FC428 penA allele has NCBI accession number LC113953.1.

Based on reference-based mapping and correcting for recombination [4], previously sequenced ceftriaxone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates, including the FC428 sharing the same penA allele, differed from our case by > 1,500 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Genetic relatedness with previous ceftriaxone resistant isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae case imported from Thailand to England, February 2018

The figure shows a recombination-corrected maximum-likelihood phylogeny based on mapping to the Neisseria gonorrhoeae NCCP11945 reference genome. It shows the relationship between the case’s isolates’ sequences and previously sequenced N. gonorrhoeae ceftriaxone resistant isolates (from NCBI/ENA BioProjects PRJNA416507, PRJNA415047, PRJEB14020 and GenBank accession number NC_002946.2) [6,7,14-17,19,21]. Isolates from the case are in bold and labelled with the identifiers used in the text.

Figure 1

We compared our isolates’ sequences to all publicly available whole-genome sequenced N. gonorrhoeae isolates. There were 7,812 sequences available for comparison, including European and North American surveillance samples and samples from a global collection. Using a rapid k-mer based search (see supplement for details), we identified the 98 most closely related genomes to the two sequences identified in our case to determine a maximum-likelihood phylogeny (Figure 2). The phylogeny contains two deep clades, the top clade contains the sequences from our case, which is predominantly from NG-MAST ST4995 and closely-related STs (collectively known as genogroup G4995); our case differs from G4995 by approximately 400 SNPs. The most closely related genomes were within 45 SNPs and were obtained in China (isolation dates unavailable) with additional genomes within 54 and 71 SNPs from the UK (2014) and Japan (2015), respectively. N. gonorrhoeae evolves at 3.6 SNPs per genome per year [4] meaning that the most recent common ancestor of these strains is likely to be from several years earlier. These related sequences each contained four copies of the 23S rRNA A2059G mutation conferring high-level azithromycin resistance; however, all contained the ceftriaxone-susceptible penA II allele. No other sequence in the tree contained any of the three penA key mutations associated with ceftriaxone resistance i.e. A311V, T316P and T483S.

Figure 2.

Phylogeny of the most closely related existing Neisseria gonorrhoeae genome sequences to the imported Neisseria gonorrhoeae case from Thailand to England, February 2018

CRO-R: ceftriaxone resistant; HL-AziR: high-level azithromycin resistant.

The figure shows a recombination-corrected maximum-likelihood phylogeny based on mapping to a novel hybrid assembly of the case’s sequences (ENA Sample ERS2461487). It shows the relationship between isolate sequences identified from our case and the most closely genetically related previously sequenced Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates. Sequences are labelled with country and year of isolation where available (obtained either from the European Nucleotide Archive or the sequence submitter); sequence run accession numbers are provided. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were inferred from available sequence data [5]. Isolates from the case are shown in bold and labelled with the identifiers used in the text. The NG-MAST genogroup G4995’s most recent common ancestor is indicated by an arrow.

Figure 2

Discussion

This is the first reported ceftriaxone-resistant, high-level azithromycin resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolate worldwide. The emergence of dual resistance to the last remaining mainstream treatment options poses serious challenges for the management and control of gonorrhoea infections globally. The strain was also resistant to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Although our case’s urethral infection was cleared with empirical ceftriaxone/doxycycline treatment, his asymptomatic pharyngeal infection failed treatment despite the relatively high dose of ceftriaxone used (1 g, compared to 250–500 mg frequently used) and the MIC just above the resistance breakpoint. This suggests that increased ceftriaxone dosing may not be adequate in similar cases. The case also failed spectinomycin treatment despite in vitro susceptibility. The limited efficacy of spectinomycin [9], as well as gentamicin [10,11] in pharyngeal infection, has been previously described.

The first sustained national transmission of isolates with high-level resistance to azithromycin (MIC ≥ 256 mg/L) has been recently documented in the UK [12], as well as a cluster of cases in Hawaii [13]. However, only a limited number of ceftriaxone-resistant isolates (MIC ≥ 0.25 mg/L) cases have been characterised in detail worldwide. These include strains H041/WHO-X (Japan 2009, ceftriaxone MIC 2–4 mg/L) [7], F89/WHO-Y (France and Spain 2010, 1–2 mg/L) [14,15], A8806/WHO-Z (Australia 2013, 0.5 mg/L) [16], GU140106 (Japan 2014, 0.5 mg/L) [17], a strain in Argentina 2014 (0.5 mg/L) [18], and FC428 (Japan 2015, 0.5 mg/L) [6]. While the earlier reports were not associated with apparent sustained onward transmission, subsequent spread of strains closely related to FC428 have been reported in Canada [19], Denmark [20] and Australia [21] in 2017 and are predominately associated with travel to south-east Asia. However, these previous strains were either susceptible, intermediate or had low-level resistance to azithromycin with MICs of 0.25–1 mg/L. Six strains in a multi-institutional series from Japan (2000–2015) [22] and several isolates from a Chinese series (2013–2016) [23] were ceftriaxone-resistant with MICs of 0.5 mg/L, as well as a case from the United States in 2017 [24]. In 2014, combined azithromycin and ceftriaxone treatment failure was reported in the UK, with MICs of 1 and 0.25 mg/L respectively [25].

Dual resistance against recommended antibiotics for first-line treatment, including high-level azithromycin resistance, had not been reported until Public Health England issued an alert regarding this current case [26]. A similar public health alert has since been released by the Australian Department of Health, whereby they reported two further cases [27].

In our case, dual resistance arose via two known antimicrobial resistance mechanisms, which combined in the same isolate for the first recorded time. Comparing our isolates with all previously genome sequenced N. gonorrhoeae isolates, we found that our isolates contain the same penA allele found in FC428 from Japan in 2015, but their overall genomes differ substantially (by > 1,500 SNPs). The isolates from our case were more closely related (circa 400 SNPs) to those from genogroup G4995, which was the eighth most commonly circulating NG-MAST genogroup in Europe in 2013 [28]. To date, the spread of ceftriaxone-resistant strains has been limited, which is possibly due to the limited fitness of these strains. However, our isolate represents the concerning new combination of a ceftriaxone resistant penA allele that has disseminated to several countries including Japan, Australia, Canada, and Denmark, together with high-level azithromycin resistance, in a genetic background similar to a successful and commonly circulating strain.

Conclusion

Combined high-level resistance to azithromycin and resistance to ceftriaxone poses a global public health threat. Greater access to resistance testing, including through the development of new molecular diagnostics, is required to help guide treatment and ensure robust antimicrobial stewardship. This combined with increased use of test of cure, effective partner notification and fast-tracked development of new treatments and ideally a gonococcal vaccine, requires urgent action. The treatment failure also illustrates the severe difficulties in effectively treating pharyngeal gonorrhoea, and enhanced focus on appropriate detection and treatment of pharyngeal gonorrhoea, including in heterosexual men and women, is essential. This case, taken together with previous reports, highlights the global nature of antimicrobial resistance in gonorrhoea and in particular the importance of transmission in south-east Asia where systematic surveillance to date has been relatively limited. International cooperation is key to ensuring that gonorrhoea remains a treatable infection.

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at the University of Oxford in partnership with Public Health England (PHE); and by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or Public Health England. NIHR HPRU Independent Steering Committee: John Coia, Neil French, Charis Marwick, Mike Sharland. DWE is a NIHR Clinical Lecturer and Robertson Foundation Fellow. TEAP and DWC are NIHR Senior Investigators.

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Authors’ contributions: DWE wrote the first draft of the manuscript. DWE, NDS and DG undertook the bioinformatic analysis. EL, NRR, AE clinically managed the case. KC and LB undertook the sequencing. MM, RN and MIA undertook the initial microbiological testing. GH, MJC, HF, DG and MU provided reference laboratory services and AE, MIA, GH, MJC, HF also formed part of a national response team. DWC and TEAP designed the sequencing experiments and provided advice on analysis and the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Unemo M. Current and future antimicrobial treatment of gonorrhoea - the rapidly evolving Neisseria gonorrhoeae continues to challenge. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):364. 10.1186/s12879-015-1029-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 8.1. Växjö: EUCAST; 2018. Available from: http://www.eucast.org.
  • 3.Tapsall JW, Ndowa F, Lewis DA, Unemo M. Meeting the public health challenge of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009;7(7):821-34. 10.1586/eri.09.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.De Silva D, Peters J, Cole K, Cole MJ, Cresswell F, Dean G, et al. Whole-genome sequencing to determine transmission of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(11):1295-303. 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30157-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Eyre DW, De Silva D, Cole K, Peters J, Cole MJ, Grad YH, et al. WGS to predict antibiotic MICs for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(7):1937-47. 10.1093/jac/dkx067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nakayama S, Shimuta K, Furubayashi K, Kawahata T, Unemo M, Ohnishi M. New Ceftriaxone- and Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Strain with a Novel Mosaic penA Gene Isolated in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(7):4339-41. 10.1128/AAC.00504-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ohnishi M, Golparian D, Shimuta K, Saika T, Hoshina S, Iwasaku K, et al. Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of untreatable gonorrhea?: detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(7):3538-45. 10.1128/AAC.00325-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Unemo M, Shafer WM. Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the 21st century: past, evolution, and future. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):587-613. 10.1128/CMR.00010-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Judson FN, Ehret JM, Handsfield HH. Comparative study of ceftriaxone and spectinomycin for treatment of pharyngeal and anorectal gonorrhea. JAMA. 1985;253(10):1417-9. 10.1001/jama.1985.03350340069019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dowell D, Kirkcaldy RD. Effectiveness of gentamicin for gonorrhoea treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(8):589-94. 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ross JD, Harding J, Duley L, Montgomery A, Hepburn T, Tan W, et al. LB1.5 The efficacy and safety of gentamicin for the treatment of genital, pharyngeal and rectal gonorrhoea: a randomised controlled trial. Sex Transm Infect. 2017;93(Suppl 2):A42-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fifer H, Cole M, Hughes G, Padfield S, Smolarchuk C, Woodford N, et al. Sustained transmission of high-level azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in England: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):573-81. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30122-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Katz AR, Komeya AY, Kirkcaldy RD, Whelen AC, Soge OO, Papp JR, et al. Cluster of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates With High-level Azithromycin Resistance and Decreased Ceftriaxone Susceptibility, Hawaii, 2016. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(6):918-23. 10.1093/cid/cix485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Unemo M, Golparian D, Nicholas R, Ohnishi M, Gallay A, Sednaoui P. High-level cefixime- and ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in France: novel penA mosaic allele in a successful international clone causes treatment failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(3):1273-80. 10.1128/AAC.05760-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cámara J, Serra J, Ayats J, Bastida T, Carnicer-Pont D, Andreu A, et al. Molecular characterization of two high-level ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates detected in Catalonia, Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(8):1858-60. 10.1093/jac/dks162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lahra MM, Ryder N, Whiley DM. A new multidrug-resistant strain of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Australia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(19):1850-1. 10.1056/NEJMc1408109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Hatazaki K, Kameyama K, Horie K, Kato T, et al. New Clinical Strain of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with Decreased Susceptibility to Ceftriaxone, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(1):142-4. 10.3201/eid2201.150868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gianecini R, Oviedo C, Stafforini G, Galarza P. Neisseria gonorrhoeae Resistant to Ceftriaxone and Cefixime, Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(6):1139-41. 10.3201/eid2206.152091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lefebvre B, Martin I, Demczuk W, Deshaies L, Michaud S, Labbé AC, et al. Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Canada, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(2):381-3. 10.3201/eid2402.171756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Terkelsen D, Tolstrup J, Johnsen CH, Lund O, Larsen HK, Worning P, et al. Multidrug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection with ceftriaxone resistance and intermediate resistance to azithromycin, Denmark, 2017. Euro Surveill. 2017;22(42):1273. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.42.17-00659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lahra MM, Martin I, Demczuk W, Jennison AV, Lee KI, Nakayama SI, et al. Cooperative Recognition of Internationally Disseminated Ceftriaxone-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae Strain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(4):735-43. 10.3201/eid2404.171873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yasuda M, Hatazaki K, Ito S, Kitanohara M, Yoh M, Kojima M, et al. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Japan from 2000 to 2015. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(3):149-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yin Y-P, Han Y, Dai X-Q, Zheng HP, Chen SC, Zhu BY, et al. Susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to azithromycin and ceftriaxone in China: A retrospective study of national surveillance data from 2013 to 2016. PLoS Med. 2018;15(2):e1002499. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abrams AJ, Kirkcaldy RD, Pettus K, Fox JL, Kubin G, Trees DL. A Case of Decreased Susceptibility to Ceftriaxone in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Absence of a Mosaic Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 (penA) Allele. Sex Transm Dis. 2017;44(8):492-4. 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fifer H, Natarajan U, Jones L, Alexander S, Hughes G, Golparian D, et al. Failure of Dual Antimicrobial Therapy in Treatment of Gonorrhea. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(25):2504-6. 10.1056/NEJMc1512757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Public Health England. UK case of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with high-level resistance to azithromycin and resistance to ceftriaxone acquired abroad. 2018. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/694655/hpr1118_MDRGC.pdf
  • 27.Australian Department of Health. Multi-drug resistant gonorrhoea in Australia. 2018. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/ohp-gonorrhoea.htm
  • 28.Harris SR, Cole MJ, Spiteri G, Sánchez-Busó L, Golparian D, Jacobsson S, et al. Euro-GASP study group Public health surveillance of multidrug-resistant clones of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Europe: a genomic survey. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(7):758-68. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30225-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES