Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 24.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug 24;57:117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.008

Table 4.

An Illustrative Example of Incorporating Multiple Contextual Factors

Study Design
 • Randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness-based relapse prevention (MBRP) and
   twelve-step facilitation (TSF) in the treatment of substance use disorder
 • Participants complete EMA measures via smartphones for a 2-week period immediately before
   treatment and then again immediately after treatment
 • Participants are prompted to answer a set of questions on their smartphone on a quasi-random
   basis 5 times per day, with one randomly scheduled prompt in each of five 3-hour time periods
   from 8:00AM to 10:00PM.
 • Substance use will be measured via smartphones during treatment and at 3 months following the
   completion of treatment.
EMA Items for each prompt:
 • Urge → “Right now, how strong is your urge to drink/use?” (0 = none/minimal, 4 = very strong)
 • Substance Use Availability → Right now, are you in a situation where BOTH of the following
   are true: you can get access to alcohol/drugs and it would be possible to actually drink/use if you
   decided to? (0 = No, 1 = Yes)
 • Urge-Specific Self-Regulation → Please indicate whether you did any of the following since the
   last recording to STOP YOURSELF FROM USING DRUGS OR DRINKING HEAVILY
   WHEN YOU HAD AN URGE: (0 = No, 1 = Yes) Display items on self-regulation skills
   emphasized in TSF (seeking social support and stimulus control) and items on self-regulation
   skills emphasized in MBRP (emotional awareness and acceptance)
Analytic Strategy
 • Use multilevel modeling where assessment prompts (Level 1) are nested within person (Level 2)
 • Only use data from prompts in which urge is 1 or greater and substances are available (i.e.,
   answered yes to substance use availability question).
 • Moderator variable # 1: Percent substance users in social network (“percent users in network”)
 • Moderator variable # 2: Psychiatric severity
 • Conduct double moderated mediation analyses which test the following path:
   Treatment X percent users in network X psychiatric severity → momentary self-regulation →
   momentary substance use
   (i.e., the three-way interaction among treatment, percent user in network, and psychiatric severity
   predicts momentary self-regulation, which in turn predicts momentary substance use)
Hypotheses:
 • Among individuals with high psychiatric severity and a low to moderate percentage of users in
   network, the use of self-regulation skills emphasized in MBRP (emotional awareness and
   acceptance) during urge episodes will mediate the effect of receiving MBRP on momentary
   substance use
 • Among individuals with high percentage of users in network and low to moderate psychiatric
   severity, the use of the self-regulation skill emphasized in TSF (seeking social support and
   stimulus control) will mediate the effect of receiving TSF on momentary substance use