Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2018 Sep;24(9):1221–1232. doi: 10.1002/lt.25185

Table 3.

Predictors of Secondary Physical Outcomes from Repeated Measures Logistic/Negative Binomial Regression Models (n=245). Rate ratios or odds ratios greater than 1 are in bold.

Number of health-related
worries
(count of 0 to 4)
Unable to do some
physically activities as well
since donation
Still not physically back to
normal
Recovered slower or
much slower than
expected (2 or lower on
scale of 1-much slower
than expected to 3-as
expected to 5-much
faster)
Current donation-related
medical problems
Donation was physically
stressful (2 or lower on
scale of 1-very stressful to
4-not at all stressful)

Predictors a Rate Ratio (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P
value
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Post-donation time point 0.003 <0.001 <0.001 0.005 0.45 0.22
 3M vs. 2Y 1.31 (1.02, 1.68) 0.04 11.05 (6.37, 19.15) <0.001 12.20 (5.41, 27.47) <0.001 1.76 (1.27, 2.45) <0.001 0.84 (0.52, 1.35) 0.48 1.45 (0.95, 2.20) 0.08
 6M vs. 2Y 1.22 (0.96, 1.56) 0.12 3.66 (2.09, 6.40) <0.001 4.96 (2.13, 11.54) <0.001 1.19 (0.86, 1.64) 0.30 1.13 (0.73, 1.75) 0.59 1.22 (0.83, 1.78) 0.31
 1Y vs. 2Y 0.90 (0.70, 1.17) 0.47 1.63 (0.97, 2.73) 0.051 1.98 (0.85, 4.63) 0.10 1.28 (0.94, 1.75) 0.12 0.94 (0.63, 1.39) 0.75 1.45 (0.97, 2.17) 0.07
Donor recipient relationship (ref=other biological or non-biological relative) 0.01
 First degree relative 2.30 (1.32, 4.01) 0.003
 Spouse/partner 4.60 (1.53, 13.84) 0.02
 Unrelated 1.75 (0.86, 3.56) 0.12
Recipient death (time dependent) 3.55 (1.88, 6.68) 0.01 2.15 (1.05, 4.40) 0.04
Female vs. Male 1.39 (1.03, 1.87) 0.03 2.15 (1.28, 3.60) 0.003
Age at donation (per 10yrs increase) 0.81 (0.70, 0.94) 0.004
BMI at donation 0.051
 25.0–29.9 vs. < 24.9 1.82 (1.12, 2.98) 0.017
 >= 30 vs. < 24.9 1.20 (0.62, 2.32) 0.60
Length of hospital stay (per day) 1.13 (1.07, 1.20) 0.002 1.32 (1.15, 1.52) <0.001 1.63 (1.39, 1.92) <0.001 1.31 (1.10, 1.55) 0.005 1.16 (1.01, 1.32) 0.02
Hospitalized during the first month post-donation 3.25 (1.34, 7.90) 0.01
Had post-operative complications during the first month post-donation 2.33 (1.32, 4.14) 0.01
Pre-donation predictors
 MCS pre-donation (per 10 increase on scale 1 to 100) 0.79 (0.67, 0.93) 0.01 0.72 (0.54, 0.95) 0.049 0.41 (0.27, 0.60) <0.001
 Ambivalence to donate (scale of 0-no ambivalence to 7-ambivalence) 1.17 (1.06, 1.28) 0.003 1.23 (1.05, 1.45) 0.01
 Anticipated long-term health effects from donation 2.00 (1.48, 2.70) <0.001 2.03 (1.26, 3.25) 0.004
 Black sheep donor 1.73 (1.06, 2.80) 0.03
 Anyone discouraged donor to donate 1.89 (1.17, 3.05) 0.01
 Household income (per $10,000 increase)b 1.06 (1.00, 1.12) 0.04

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; MCS, mental component summary.

a

Variables tested but not significant: donor demographics (race/ethnicity, education, marital status), clinical characteristics (hospitalized within 1st month post-donation, donation complications within 1st month), Simmons psychosocial background (donation history), Simmons donation decision-making items (other possible donors, anyone encouraged donor to donate, anticipated feeling life would be more worthwhile after donation), Simmons strength of motivation to donate, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)– depression score and Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary

b

In the level of abdominal/back pain model where household income was significant, adjusting for household size didn’t change results and household size was not statistically significant.