Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Transpl. 2018 Sep;24(9):1233–1242. doi: 10.1002/lt.25194

Table 3.

Cox regression analysis for mortality rate following OLT.

Characteristic Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Age (per 5 yrs) 1.16 1.16 1.19
AFP at OLT (per 1,000 ng/mL) 1.12 1.00 1.11
AFP: rate of increase -- 3.42 1.19
Sex = female 1.45 1.59 1.51
MELD at OLT 1.03 1.03 1.02
Difference in MELD(exception – lab) 0.97 0.99 0.96
Tumor size: initial presentation 1.07 -- 1.06
Tumor number: initial presentation 1.26 -- 1.28
Tumor size: explant pathology -- 1.19 --
Tumor number: explant pathology -- 1.09 1.28
Progression (tumor size increase) 1.47 -- 1.47
Progression (tumor number increase) 1.41 -- 1.41
Time from initial presentation to OLT 1.01 1.01 1.01
Treatment (vs. no treatment)
  RFA -- -- --
  TACE -- -- --
  RFA and TACE -- -- --
Calendar year of diagnosis (per year) -- 1.01 1.05
Microvascular invasion -- 1.51 --

Values presented for each model are hazard ratios (HR), with bold indicating significant (p<0.05) and underlined indicating “near-significant” (0.05 < p < 0.10)