Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;46(5):429–443. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1032-8

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Expression of CCL-2 in the medium of the H, H + M, H + A1, H + A2, M + A1, M + A2, H + M + A1, and H + M + A2 groups at 2, 4, and 6 h, respectively. Each column represented the mean ± the standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05 vs. H group (2 h). # P < 0.05 vs. H group (2 h), H + A1 group (2 h) and M + A1 group (2 h). $ P < 0.05 vs. H group (2 h), H + A2 group (2 h), M + A2 group (2 h), H + M + A1 group (2 h). ΔP < 0.05 vs. H group (4 h), M + A1 group (2 h). P < 0.05 vs. H group (4 h), M + A2 group (2 h). & P < 0.05 vs. H group (4 h), H + A1 group (4 h), M + A1 group (4 h) and H + M + A1 group (2 h). θP < 0.05 vs. H group (4 h), H + A2 group (4 h), M + A2 group (4 h), H + M + A2 group (2 h) and H + M + A1 group (4 h). φ P < 0.05 vs. H group (6 h), M + A1 group (2 h), M + A1 group (4 h). iP < 0.05 vs. H group (6 h), M + A2 group (2 h) and M + A2 group (4 h). iiP < 0.05 vs. H group (6 h), H + A1 group (6 h), M + A1 group (6 h), H + M + A1 group (2 h), and H + M + A1 group (4 h). iiiP < 0.05 vs. H group (6 h), H + A2 group (6 h), M + A2 group (6 h), H + M + A1 group (6 h), H + M + A2 group (2 h), and H + M + A2 group (4 h). The data were representative of at least three independent experiments