Table 1.

Effect of intraperitoneal SCOP and PCP on the duration of freezing and grooming behavior measured in CFC paradigm. Results are presented as the mean duration of freezing or grooming behavior ± SEM for n = 9–10. Statistical analysis: two-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test. Significance vs. control subjected to electric shocks in CFC; *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.0001

Groups	Day of testing	Control not subjected to electric shocks in CFC	Control subjected to electric shocks in CFC	SCOP (CFC mice)	PCP (CFC mice)
Freezing behavior	Day 1	0	0.2 ± 0.2	0	0.1 ± 0.1
Time [s] ± SEM Significance vs. electric shocks-subjected CFC control ****p < 0.0001
	Day 2	0****	19.55 ± 5.276	0.5 ± 0.401****	24 ± 5.723
Grooming behavior	Day 1	0.750 ± 0.430	1.950 ± 0.545	2.350 ± 0.553	0.850 ± 0.548
Time [s] ± SEM Significance vs. electric shocks-subjected CFC control *p < 0.05
	Day 2	3.250 ± 1.389	3.100 ± 1.329	7.150 ± 1.974*	1.000 ± 0.847