Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 24;18:82. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0388-6

Table 2.

Prognostic value of IER3 protein expression for the overall survival by Cox proportional hazards model

Univariable Multivariable
Hazard Ratio 95% CI P Hazard Ratio Ratio 95% CI p
Gender
 Male vs. Female 1.14 0.62–2.10 0.681
Age 1.03 1.00–1.05 0.029 1.04 1.01–1.07 0.012
pT
  > =pT3 vs. <=pT2 2.39 1.29–4.42 0.006 1.54 0.71–3.32 0.272
pN
 pN(+) vs. pN(−) 3.41 1.95–5.99 < 0.001 2.35 1.26–4.38 0.007
LVI
 LVI(+) vs. LVI(−) 2.03 1.22–3.37 0.006 0.99 0.52–1.89 0.987
PNI
 PNI(+) vs. PNI(−) 1.03 0.56–1.87 0.935
STSM
 STSM(+) vs. STSM(−) 2.62 1.41–4.88 0.002 2.02 0.96–4.27 0.065
Metastasis
 Mets(+) vs. Mets(−) 2.35 1.41–3.97 0.001 1.81 0.98–3.33 0.058
IER3 IHC
 IER3(high) vs. IER3(low) 2.16 1.29–3.13 0.003 2.21 1.21–4.04 0.010

Bold values indicate that they are less than 0.05