Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;35:307–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.08.009

Table 2.

Odds ratio (95% CI) and β-coefficient in non-lab model and semi-lab model estimated by logistic regression analysis using the data from the training set.

Factors Non-lab(n = 8096)
Semi-lab(n = 8096)
β-Coefficient P-Value OR(95%CI) β-Coefficient P-Value OR(95%CI)
Age(years) 0.05 <0.01 1.05(1.04–1.06) 0.06 <0.01 1.06(1.05–1.07)



Gender
Female 1.00 1.00
Male 0.28 <0.01 1.32(1.11–1.57) −0.07 0.01 0.94(0.72–1.21)



Ethnic groups
Han 1.00 1.00
Korean 0.22 0.08 1.24(0.97–1.59) 0.15 0.31 1.16(0.87–1.53)
Dai −0.01 0.93 0.99(0.76–1.28) 0.17 0.32 1.19(0.86–1.56)
Kazak −1.42 <0.01 0.24(0.15–0.37) −1.44 <0.01 0.24(0.14–0.38)
Uyghur −0.83 <0.01 0.48(0.31–0.60) −0.54 <0.01 0.58(0.40–0.82)
Zhuang −0.03 0.78 0.97(0.78–1.20) −0.06 0.64 0.94(0.73–1.21)



Vegetable daily consumption
Very low 1.00 1.00
Low −0.60 0.33 0.55(0.18–2.11) −0.98 0.15 0.37(0.11–1.68)
Normal −1.01 0.09 0.36(0.12–1.36) −1.39 0.04 0.25(0.07–1.08)
High −0.98 0.11 0.37(0.12–1.41) −1.27 0.06 0.28(0.08–1.23)



Hypertension
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 0.47 <0.01 1.60(1.36–1.90) 0.28 <0.01 1.32(1.09–1.60)



Family history of DM
No 1.00 1.00
Yes 0.54 <0.01 1.72(1.41–2.08) 0.37 <0.01 1.45(1.16–1.81)
BMI(kg/m2) 0.08 <0.01 1.08(1.04–1.12) 0.09 <0.01 1.10(1.06–1.14)
Waist circumference(cm) 0.03 <0.01 1.03(1.02–1.04) 0.02 0.01 1.02(1.01–1.04)



Glycosuria qualitative
1.00
+/− 1.62 <0.01 5.05(2.80–8.75)
+ 2.28 <0.01 24.96(19.15–32.63)



Interactive effect
Others 1.00
+/− *Gender = male −0.19 0.65 0.82(0.36–1.89)
+ *Gender = male −0.50 0.01 0.61(0.41–0.90)

AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; OR, odds ratio; BMI, body mass index. +/−*Gender = male means glycosuria qualitative +/− interactive with male gender, +*Gender = male means glycosuria qualitative + interactive with male gender.