Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 24;8:14302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32604-x

Table 1.

UV reflectance in fruits.

Term Estimate SE df x 2 P
(Intercept) 0.065 0.103
UV in leaves 0.560 0.103 1 27.142 <0.001
Dispersal – Bird 0.027 0.042 2 2.136 0.344
Dispersal – Mixed −0.028 0.032
Site – KNP 0.017 0.038 2 3.826 0.148
Site – RNP 0.061 0.036

Results of a PGLS model with square-root transformed reflectance values as response variable. The full model was significantly better than the null model (X2 = 32.856, df = 9, p < 0.001). The interaction between syndrome and site was not significant (Χ2 = 2.491, df = 4, P = 0.646) and was thus removed from the model in order to establish P-values for the main effects.