Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204394

Table 2. Quality variables by cluster membership and predicted latent class.

Quality variables Full sample Cluster Membership Latent Class Membership
Other* 1 2 1 2 3
1. Minutes to complete questionnaire (median) 21 21 14 935 20 15 935
2. Correlation of synonyms (mean)
within-person correlation of items with strongest overall correlation
0.4 0.39 0.58 0.33 0.28 0.59 0.33
3. Even-odd item correlation (mean)
Correlation of even/odd items on unidimensional scales
0.62 0.61 0.74 0.66 0.60 0.64 0.62
4. Distance from average (mean)
Euclidean distance between participant’s responses and population average responses
15.64 15.82 12.85 15.33 17.40 13.45 15.18
5. Runs of identical responses (mean)
Average over pages with many items
0.43 0.44 0.47 0.27 0.43 0.49 0.27
6. Inconsistent state/climate selection 15.0% 12.9% 16.9% 61.2% 6.8% 13.8% 52.7%
7. Non-US phone 16.0% 15.3% 13.9% 36.7% 13.1% 8.4% 52.0%
8. Wrong phone number 13.0% 13.8% 9.2% 2.0% 8.9% 22.4% 1.3%
9. Obviously fake name 6.8% 6.8% 12.3% 0.0% 0.5% 16.3% 3.3%
10. Nonsensical feedback
e.g. “dsadasdasd”
2.8% 2.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.3% 7.1% 0.0%
11. Discrepancies within questionnaire 4.3% 3.8% 16.9% 0.0% 2.3% 7.7% 2.0%
12. Other 9.3% 9.7% 6.2% 4.1% 7.4% 12.5% 7.3%

Note: Shading emphasizes unusual behavior patterns as measured by the quality indicators

*“Other” denotes membership in one of the clusters not identified as usually large/similar