Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 25;13(9):e0204337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204337

Table 2. Influenza A positive samples by electrical impedance and RT-PCR assays from preschool.

Control Humidified Control vs. humidified
SampleType Assay %positive n %positive n OR, [95% CI], P> |z|
Mixed (fomites and air) Electrical impedance 48.1 27 16.7 18 LCSα
Mixed (fomites and air) PCR 20 320 14.5 330 LCSα
Fomites PCR 22.1 140 18.0 150 0.51, [0.33–0.78], 0.002
Air (total) PCR 18.3 180 11.7 180 0.51, [0.29–0.89], 0.020
Air <1 μm PCR 13.3 60 10.0 60 1.25, [0.91–1.72], 0.174
Air 1–4 μm PCR 25.0 60 16.7 60 0.48, [0.16–1.42], 0.183
Air >4 μm PCR 16.7 60 8.3 60 0.51, [0.23–1.10], 0.087

Percentage positive were calculated by dividing the number of positive samples by the number of samples taken in that condition. The sample number (n) is indicated. Samples tested by PCR included all fomites and air samples and are shown combined and separated into fomite and air (total) categories. Additionally air samples were separated into the three sizes of air particles collected. Statistical analyses of OR, 95% CI and P>|z| are indicated. α Indicates low cell size (LCS) so statistical analyses not run due to small sample size.