Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 26;22(1):16. doi: 10.3390/molecules22010016

Table 7.

Antioxidant activity of four meadowsweet floral tea decoctions and reference compounds a.

Method b F. camschatica F. denudata F. stepposa F. ulmaria
DPPH 23.72 ± 0.59 ii 8.13 ± 0.21 ii 7.33 ± 0.19 ii 10.43 ± 0.26 ii
ABTS•+ 9.76 ± 0.23 iv 4.97 ± 0.11 iii 4.08 ± 0.08 iii 5.74 ± 0.12 iii
Br•− 111.89 ± 2.12 v 241.95 ± 4.35 vi 259.64 ± 4.67 vi 228.11 ± 4.33 v, vi
CBA 21.16 ± 0.76 4.11 ± 0.15 ix 3.53 ± 0.12 viii, ix 4.55 ± 0.16 ix
Spiraeoside Rugosin D Methyl salicylate Trolox
DPPH 82.40 ± 2.14 5.36 ± 0.11 i >100 7.40 ± 0.14 i
ABTS•+ 7.02 ± 0.14 iii, iv 0.70 ± 0.01 59.18 ± 1.24 4.27 ± 0.08 iii
Br•− 1046.82 ± 19.88 vii 1293.63 ± 24.58 vii 331.53 ± 5.96 vi 663.25 ± 12.98
CBA >100 2.62 ± 0.09 >100 2.70 ± 0.10 viii

a Average of three analyses (±SD); b DPPH—DPPH radical scavenging activity (IC50, μg/mL); ABTS•+—ABTS•+ radical scavenging activity (IC50, μg/mL); Br•−—bromine anion radical scavenging activity (mg gallic acid equivalents per g extract); CBA—carotene bleaching assay (IC50, μg/mL). All values correspond to mean values ± standard deviation of three replicates. Values with different letters (i–ix) indicate statistically significant differences among groups at p < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA.