Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;35(11):210. doi: 10.1007/s11095-018-2493-3

Table IV.

Bidirectional Permeability Data in Buffer and Plasma for P-gp Substrates. Data Represent the Mean ± SD for n = 3–4 Flux Profiles Per Experiment

Compound (fu in plasma)a Assay media Mass balance (%) Papp (10−6 cm/s) Efflux ratio
A-B B-A A-B B-A
3H-Digoxin (0.61) Buffer 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 2.7 ± 0.21 18 ± 0.58 6.7 ± 0.56
Plasma 93 ± 7.6 100 ± 5.8 4.7 ± 0.15b 26 ± 1.5 5.5 ± 0.36b
3H-Digoxin (0.61) + 100 μM Verapamil Buffer 99 ± 0.58 100 ± 0.58 4.6 ± 0.46 5.8 ± 0.53 1.3 ± 0.18
Plasma 96 ± 2.1 99 ± 0.58 6.2 ± 1.0 7.4 ± 0.49b 1.2 ± 0.21
Talinolol (0.48) Buffer 99 ± 1.7 100 ± 6.1 1.1 ± 0.058 17 ± 1.5 15 ± 1.5
Plasma 96 ± 1.2 98 ± 2.1 2.8 ± 0.46b 34 ± 2.6b 12 ± 2.2
Rhodamine 123 (0.35) Buffer 99 ± 11 99 ± 1.2 1.6 ± 0.32 9.7 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 1.4
Plasma 98 ± 1.5 92 ± 4.7 1.2 ± 0.058 14 ± 1.5b 12 ± 1.4b
Verapamil (0.14) Buffer 91 ± 8.5 83 ± 5.8 41 ± 4.6 45 ± 1.5 1.1 ± 0.13
Plasma 94 ± 2.1 96 ± 5.5b 110 ± 12b 120 ± 5.8b 1.1 ± 0.13
Saquinavir (0.040) Buffer 76 ± 0.58 60 ± 5.6 2.4 ± 1.4 34 ± 2.1 14 ± 8.2
Plasma 100 ± 7.2b 110 ± 7.5b 8.4 ± 2.5b 140 ± 42b 17 ± 7.2

afu values determined at a similar concentration compared to that used for the Caco-2 experiment

bvalue in plasma was statistically different to the corresponding value in buffer (α = 0.05)