Table 2.
Study data
| Author | Journal | Year | Study Design | Amputation Level | Exercise Testing Modality | %VO2max | Maximum workload (W) | Attrition rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chin et al. | J Rehabil Res Dev | 2012 | Prospective Cohort | Hip Disarticulation | 1-leg ergometer | 57.2 ± 11.1% | 0% | |
| Chin et al. | Am J Phys Med Rehabil | 2002 | Prospective Cohort | Lower Extremity | 1-leg ergometer | 80.00% | 67.6 + 20.2 W | 0% |
| Chin et al. | Am J Phys Med Rehabil | 2006 | Prospective Cohort | Transfemoral/Hip Disarticulation | 1-leg ergometer | 64.4 ± 14.4% | X | 0% |
| Chin et al. | Prosthet Orthot Int | 2002 | Retrospective Cohort | Transfemoral | 1-leg ergometer | 58.6 ± 7.6% | X | 0% |
| Erjavec et al. | Disabil Rehabil | 2014 | Prospective Cohort | Unilateral Transfemoral | Upper Extremity | X | 50 W | 37% |
| Erjavec et al. | Eur J Phys Med Rehabil | 2008 | Prospective Cohort | Transfemoral | Upper Extremity | X | 40 W | 1% |
| Hamamura, et al. | J Int Med Res | 2009 | Retrospective Cohort | History of TFA or HD | 1-leg ergometer | 58.80% | X | X |
| Vestering, et al. | Int J Rehabil Res | 2005 | Case Series | Unilateral Lower Extremity | combined upper/lower extremity ergometer | 63.69% (combined), 73.3% (UE) | 95 W (combined), 106.7 W (UE) | 20% |
| Wezenburg et al. | Ann Phys Med Rehabil | 2012 | Retrospective Cohort | Transtibial, transfemoral | 1-leg cycle ergometer | X | 132.0 W peak | 3% |
| Van Velzen et al. | Disabi Rehabil | 2006 | Systematic Review | Lower Extremity | Rowing machine, UE ergometer | X | Level 2: 44 + 3 W, Level 3: 71 + 4 W | N/A |