Table 1.
Summary of statistical models that best fit observed ILDs
| # Intronsa | # Speciesb |
rRMSE < 10–3 (%)c |
Fr < LN (%)d |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fr | LN | rRMSE | AIC | BIC | ||
| >0 | 1082 | 88.8 | 74.3 | 91.5 | 82.8 | 82.3 |
| >1000 | 1022 | 94.0 | 78.7 | 93.2 | 86.6 | 86.1 |
| >10 000 | 938 | 98.2 | 82.4 | 93.9 | 86.8 | 86.6 |
| >100 000 | 341 | 100.0 | 99.7 | 93.8 | 86.2 | 86.2 |
a
Number of available intron samples. The cut-off sample size used in this study is shown by bold face.
b
Number of species for which the number of available intron samples is within the range that shown in the first column.
c
Percentage of ILDs for which the rRMSE values of the best model are smaller than 10-3. Fr, Frechet model; LN, log-normal model.
d
Percentage of ILDs for which the best Frechet model outperforms the best log-normal model with respect to the specified criterion. The numbers of components in the compared models may differ from each other.