Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;34(19):3273–3280. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty307

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of assemblies generated from ORNA, Diginorm and TIS reduced datasets. Each point on a line corresponds to a different parametrization of the algorithms. The amount of data reduction (x-axis) is compared against the assembly performance measured as % of complete (y-axis, see text). (a) and (d) Represent TransABySS assemblies (k =21) applied on normalized brain and hESC data, respectively. (b) and (e) Represent Trinity assemblies (k =25) and (c) and (f) represent Oases multi-kmer assemblies applied on normalized brain and hESC data, respectively