Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;34(19):3273–3280. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty307

Table 1.

Comparison of average F1 scores using REF-EVAL

Method Brain
hESC
Oases TransABySS Trinity Oases TransABySS Trinity
unreduced 0.402 0.441 0.414 0.304 0.577 0.621
ORNA 0.404 0.440 0.421 0.302 0.582 0.616
Diginorm 0.411 0.418 0.419 0.280 0.578 0.601
TIS 0.419 0.437 0.413 0.283 0.579 0.599

Notes: Each entry in a cell denotes the average of F1 scores obtained by assembling brain and hESC datasets normalized by the three algorithms (ORNA, Diginorm and TIS) in the rows. Averages are taken over results obtained with several parameters for each algorithm. The F1 score obtained for the original (unreduced) dataset is shown in the first row. Columns denote the assembler used. The highest F1 score obtained comparing all reduction methods is highlighted per assembler.