Table 5.
Linear effects of CBDDM implementation strength score and test of trend
| Maternal and Newborn Health Care Practice | Linear Effects of CBDDM | Test for Trend | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | (95% CI) | p-value | p-valuea | Dose-Response Relationship | |
| ANC 4+ | 1.12 | (0.99, 1.26) | 0.067 | ND | No |
| Neonatal tetanus protected birth | 1.23 | (1.09, 1.38) | < 0.001 | 0.056 | Yes |
| Institutional delivery | 1.47 | (1.25, 1.73) | < 0.001 | 0.748 | Yes |
| PNC in 48 h | 1.07 | (0.91, 1.27) | 0.418 | ND | No |
| Clean cord care among home deliveries | 1.21 | (1.01, 1.44) | 0.039 | 0.827 | Yes |
| Thermal care | 1.29 | (1.08, 1.55) | 0.006 | 0.136 | Yes |
| Immediate initiation of breastfeeding | 1.27 | (1.10, 1.46) | 0.001 | 0.596 | Yes |
CBDDM Community-Based Data for Decision-Making, OR odds ratio, ND not done, ANC 4+ received four or more antenatal care visits, PNC postnatal care. aNull hypothesis: Not a trend effect