Table 3.
Tabulation of the Distribution of Study Participants According to Robson Criteria Against Skin-to-Skin Contact Progress Indicators
| Group | Pre-birth | Immediate hospital policy at birth | Immediate emergent care after birth | Immediate delayed <5 at birth | Immediate skin-to-skin | Continuous removed for emergent care | Continuous removed for routine care | Continuous | Uninterrupted staff interfered | Uninterrupted family interfered | Uninterrupted | Did not achieve 9 stages | Met standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 7 |
| 2 | A. 16 | A. 0 | A. 8 | A. 4 | A. 4 | A. 1 | A. 1 | A. 6 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 6 | A. 6 | A. 0 |
| 3 | 19 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 |
| 4 | A. 15 | A. 0 | A. 5 | A. 1 | A. 9 | A. 1 | A. | A. 9 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 9 | A. 4 | A. 5 |
| 5 | A. 7 | A. 0 | A. 4 | A. 0 | A. 3 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 3 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 3 | A. 2 | A. 1 |
| B. 3 | B. 0 | B. 2 | B. 1 | B. 0 | B. 0 | B. 0 | B. 1 | B. 0 | B. 0 | B. 1 | B. 1 | ||
| 6 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| 7 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| 8 | A. 1 | A. 0 | A. 1 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 | A. 0 |
| 9 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| 10 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Para unrecorded | (4) | (2) | (1) | (1) | |||||||||
| 84 | 0 | 31 | 12 | 41 | 4 | 1 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 25 | 23 |
The number of women in each category of Robson criteria prebirth according to the patient record is indicated in the blue column. The yellow, green, and red columns match the colors of the pathways of the algorithm, HCP-S2S-IA. Green indicates best practice, yellow indicates a practice that should be reviewed, and red indicates dyads who left the best practice pathway. The dyads with missing data are recorded as “Para unrecorded.” These incomplete dyads are not included in the count, and are not included in the Algorithm.