Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;3(5):e000757. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000757

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics by treatment arm (n, %)

Control
(n=1273)
Advanced planning
(n=1267)
Block leader recruitment
(n=1180)
Contingent group lottery
(n=1202)
Total sample
(n=4922)
Pearson χ2 P values
Cycle 1 household status
  Sprayed, infested 49 (3.9%) 37 (2.9%) 39 (3.1%) 40 (3.3%) 165 (3.4%) 1.71 0.64
  Sprayed, not infested 1004 (78.9%) 1005 (79.3%) 892 (75.6%) 944 (78.5%) 3845 (78.1%) 6.01 0.11
  Closed 104 (8.2%) 94 (7.4%) 74 (6.3%) 80 (6.7%) 352 (7.2%) 3.94 0.27
  Refused 98 (7.7%) 106 (8.4%) 118 (10.0%) 123 (10.2%) 445 (9.0%) 6.89 0.08
  Uninhabited 12 (0.9%) 15 (1.2%) 8 (0.7%) 10 (0.8%) 45 (0.9%) 1.84 0.61
  Vacant lot 2 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%) 48 (4.1%) 2 (0.2%) 53 (1.1%) 130.4 <0.01
  Public lot 4 (0.3%) 9 (0.7%) 1 (0.1%) 3 (0.3%) 17 (0.4%) 7.58 0.06

Sprayed: house was treated with insecticide by campaign brigade. Infested: campaign staff found evidence of infestation by triatomine insects. Closed: no household member answered the door during campaign visits. Refused: household declined to allow the campaign to spray the house.