Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2018 Apr;39(4):515–517. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001728

TABLE 1.

Prevalance of and number of individuals aged 60+ with a hybrida CI or conventionalb CI audiometric profile

Hybrid CI Audiometric Profile (Better Ear) Hybrid CI Audiometric Profile (Worse Ear) Conventional CI Audiometric Profile
Age Decade Prevalence (95% CI) N2020 (Millions) N2060 (Millions) Prevalence (95% CI) N 2020 (Millions) N 2060 (Millions) Prevalence (95% CI) N 2020 (Millions) N 2060 (Millions)
60–69 0.71 (0.18, 1.24) 0.28 0.34 2.87 (1.52, 4.22) 1.13 1.39 1.01 (0.24, 1.79) 0.40 0.49
70–79 2.57 (1.60, 3.54) 0.64 1.03 6.35 (4.53, 8.17) 1.59 2.54 2.47 (1.27, 3.68) 0.62 0.99
80+ 4.46 (2.82, 6.10) 0.59 1.52 8.00 (6.17, 9.84) 1.06 2.72 6.80 (4.70, 8.90) 0.90 2.31
Total 60+c 1.94 (1.41, 2.48) 1.51 2.89 4.86 (3.88, 5.84) 3.78 6.65 2.47 (1.78, 3.16) 1.92 3.79

aHybrid audiometric profile defined as a threshold at 0.5 kHz, ≤60 dB HL, and a high-frequency (2, 3, and 4 kHz) PTA threshold ≥75 dB HL.

bConventional CI audiometric profile defined as a better-ear 4-frequency (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) PTA >60 dB.

cTotal count is the sum of counts by age decade. Total count includes overlap in individuals meeting hybrid and conventional CI candidacy. In 2020, 1.05 million adults aged 60+ meet better-ear audiometric criteria for both devices, increasing to 2.04 million in 2060. The number of unique individuals meeting better ear audiometric criteria from implantable hearing devices is 2.38 million in 2020 and 4.64 million in 2060.

CI indicates cochlear implant; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.