Table 2. Dose report and comparison for different kV settings.
Scan parameter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
High pitch (n = 81) | Overall | 70 kV | 80 kV | 90 kV | p-value |
Effective tube current (mAs) | 505 ± 91 | 462 ±98 | 539 ± 67 | 539 ± 79 | 0.001† |
CTDIvol (mGy) | 2.2 ± 1.0 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | <0.001† |
DLP (mGy*cm) | 72 ± 24 | 51 ± 8 | 80 ± 8 | 111 ± 16 | <0.001† |
Effective dose (mSv) | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | <0.001† |
AS (n = 33) | |||||
Effective tube current (mAs) | 347 ± 71 | 336 ± 79 | 396 ± 26 | 346 ± 15 | 0.237 |
CTDIvol (mGy) | 10.6 ± 5.1 | 8.2 ± 2.4 | 14.3 ± 2.6 | 20.9 ± 3.4 | <0.001† |
DLP (mGy*cm) | 171 ± 75 | 135 ± 33 | 238 ± 53 | 309 ± 63 | <0.001† |
Effective dose (mSv) | 3.3 ± 1.9 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 5.1 ± 2.7 | 5.8 ± 2.1 | 0.002† |
Note–Values are presented as means ± standard deviation.
High pitch = prospective ‘high pitch’ scan protocol; AS = prospective ‘adaptive sequence’ scan protocol; CTDI = CT dose index; DLP = dose length product.
†Kruskal-Wallis test showed significance between kV settings.