Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2018 May 9;80(4):888–901. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12489

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Examining Childbearing Ambivalence at Baseline (N= 1,501 women; 1,518 men)

Women Men

Variable Odds
Ratio
p
value
SE Odds
Ratio
p
value
SE
Individual Approach
Muslim 1.57 .073 0.39 1.03 .890 0.22
Born again Christian 1.77 .003 0.35 0.94 .661 0.13
Impulsivity 1.12 .256 0.11 1.08 .404 0.09
SES 0.99 .876 0.04 0.99 .878 0.03
Years of education 0.96 .303 0.03 1.00 .904 0.02
Life Course Approach
Marital status
  Currently married ref ref
  Formerly married 0.71 .244 0.21 1.53 .404 0.78
    Never married 1.09 .732 0.29 1.49 .077 0.34
Enrolled in school 0.19 .000 0.06 0.37 .000 0.08
Number of children
0 ref ref
1 0.66 .082 0.16 1.40 .108 0.29
2 0.52 .028 0.16 1.31 .287 0.33
3+ 0.22 .001 0.10 1.05 .865 0.31
Age 1.14 .001 0.04 1.06 .002 0.02

Pseudo Chi2 0.098 0.058

Note: All coefficients are expressed as odds ratios.

ref = reference category.