Table 1.
Cases n, (%) | |
---|---|
Age (years) | |
<40 | 7 (9.5) |
≥40 | 67 (90.5) |
Pretreatment evaluation methodsa | |
MRI | 26 (35.1) |
PET–CT | 19 (25.7) |
Pelvic examination under anesthesia | 14 (18.9) |
Neoadjuvant treatment | |
None | 19 (25.7) |
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | 42 (56.8) |
Neoadjuvant radio/chemoradiaotherapy | 13 (17.6) |
Tumor size (cm) | |
≤4 cm | 41 (55.4) |
>4 cm | 33 (44.6) |
Histological subtype | |
Squamous cell carcinoma | 65 (87.8) |
Adenocarcinoma | 9 (12.2) |
Pathological PMI | |
Positive | 21 (28.4) |
Negative | 53 (71.6) |
LVSI | |
Positive | 27 (36.5) |
Negative | 47 (63.5) |
Pelvic lymph node metastasis | |
Positive | 31 (41.9) |
Negative | 43 (58.1) |
Deep stromal infiltration | |
Positive | 62 (83.8) |
Negative | 12 (16.2) |
Surgical margins | |
Positive | 7 (9.5) |
Negative | 67 (90.5) |
Postoperative treatment | |
None | 7 (9.5) |
Chemotherapy | 12 (16.2) |
Radio/chemoradiotherapy | 55 (74.3) |
Notes:
All patients were routinely evaluated by pelvic examination and ultrasound in our study. The evaluation methods listed here include other image modalities except the routinely used methods mentioned earlier.
Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET–CT, positron emission tomography–computed tomography; PMI, parametrial involvement; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion.