Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;11:5527–5533. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S173208

Table 1.

Patient characteristics (N=74)

Cases n, (%)
Age (years)
<40 7 (9.5)
≥40 67 (90.5)
Pretreatment evaluation methodsa
MRI 26 (35.1)
PET–CT 19 (25.7)
Pelvic examination under anesthesia 14 (18.9)
Neoadjuvant treatment
None 19 (25.7)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy 42 (56.8)
Neoadjuvant radio/chemoradiaotherapy 13 (17.6)
Tumor size (cm)
≤4 cm 41 (55.4)
>4 cm 33 (44.6)
Histological subtype
Squamous cell carcinoma 65 (87.8)
Adenocarcinoma 9 (12.2)
Pathological PMI
Positive 21 (28.4)
Negative 53 (71.6)
LVSI
Positive 27 (36.5)
Negative 47 (63.5)
Pelvic lymph node metastasis
Positive 31 (41.9)
Negative 43 (58.1)
Deep stromal infiltration
Positive 62 (83.8)
Negative 12 (16.2)
Surgical margins
Positive 7 (9.5)
Negative 67 (90.5)
Postoperative treatment
None 7 (9.5)
Chemotherapy 12 (16.2)
Radio/chemoradiotherapy 55 (74.3)

Notes:

a

All patients were routinely evaluated by pelvic examination and ultrasound in our study. The evaluation methods listed here include other image modalities except the routinely used methods mentioned earlier.

Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET–CT, positron emission tomography–computed tomography; PMI, parametrial involvement; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion.