Table 2.
Reference | Selection
|
Comparibility | Outcome
|
Overall | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representative | Selection | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration | Outcome | Follow-up | Adequacy follow-up | |||
Luketich et al,9 2012 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Brown et al,10 2017 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Hao et al,17 2014 | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 6 |
Nguyen et al,18 2008 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Chen et al,192017 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Hou et al,202017 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Zhai 20 1 521 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
wu et al,22 2014 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Lin et al,23 2014 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Mei et al,24 2016 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
wei 20 1 625 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Rajan et al,26 2010 | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 6 |
Schmidt et al,27 2017 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 8 |
Chang et al,28 2018 | ★ | ★ | ★ | ★ | ☆ | ★ | ★ | ★ | 7 |
Note: “★” means score one point, “☆” means score zero point.
Abbreviation: NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.