Table 3. Comparison between the automated and manual Padua Prediction Score.
| Automated PPS extraction N = 311, n (%) |
Manual PPS extraction N = 311, n (%) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Active cancer | 7 (2) | 33 (11) |
| Recent trauma | 32 (10) | |
| Previous VTE | 6 (2) | 28 (9) |
| Heart failure | 51 (16) | 84 (27) |
| Respiratory failure | 63 (20) | 94 (30) |
| Rheumatological Illness | 88 (28) | 130 (42) |
| Thrombophilic history | 0 (0) | 1 (0.3) |
| Obesity | 143 (46) | 101 (33) |
| Ongoing hormone use | 8 (3) | 5 (2) |
| Acute MI | 2 (0.6) | 4 (1) |
| Acute stroke | 10 (3) | 3 (1) |
| Acute infection | 71 (23) | 139 (45) |
| Restricted mobility | 40 (13) | 33 (11) |
| Padua Score, mean SD a | 2.8 (1.4) | 3.6 (1.8) |
| High risk, score ≥ 4 | 75 (24) | 129 (41) |
Abbreviations: MI, myocardial infarction; PPS, Padua Prediction Score; SD, standard deviation; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
a
Automated PPS out of possible 19 points, manual PPS out of possible 20 points.